Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

This won't happen at the big corporations

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • This won't happen at the big corporations

    CEO Slashes Pay to Raise Company 'Minimum Wage' to $70,000

  • #2
    I'll admit I didn't read the article, but is he giving up stock options or just salary?
    "Don't measure yourself by what you have accomplished, but by what you should accomplish with your ability."
    -John Wooden

    Comment


    • #3
      In 2013 the average Fortune 500 CEO made 380 times the average employee. CEO: $12,300,000 or $5,913.46/hour Ave Non-Supervisory Employee: $32,368.42 or $15.56/hour


      In 2014 this number fell to 296 times the average employee. CEO: $15,200,000 or $7,307.69/hour Ave Non-Supervisory Employee: $52,100 or $25.05/hour


      I would like to see the data set as there appears to be some rounding assumptions in the calculations. Regardless of the data set one thing is for certain that in 1980 the average CEO made 40 times the average employee and it is now significantly greater.
      “Losers Average Losers.” ― Paul Tudor Jones

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by DUShock View Post
        In 2013 the average Fortune 500 CEO made 380 times the average employee. CEO: $12,300,000 or $5,913.46/hour Ave Non-Supervisory Employee: $32,368.42 or $15.56/hour


        In 2014 this number fell to 296 times the average employee. CEO: $15,200,000 or $7,307.69/hour Ave Non-Supervisory Employee: $52,100 or $25.05/hour


        I would like to see the data set as there appears to be some rounding assumptions in the calculations. Regardless of the data set one thing is for certain that in 1980 the average CEO made 40 times the average employee and it is now significantly greater.
        I'd say any study that has average worker salary go from $32K to $52K in a single year suffers from something critically amiss.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by wu_shizzle View Post
          I'll admit I didn't read the article, but is he giving up stock options or just salary?
          That link only included a video. Here is a New York Times article on it, but I don't know if it mentioned stock options. I only glanced through it.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by 1979Shocker View Post
            That link only included a video. Here is a New York Times article on it, but I don't know if it mentioned stock options. I only glanced through it.

            http://www.nytimes.<br /> <br /> <...year.html?_r=0

            From the article:

            As Mr. Kahneman has explained it, income above the threshold doesn’t buy happiness, but a lack of money can deprive you of it.
            Kansas is Flat. The Earth is Not!!

            Comment


            • #7
              I read this article yesterday. It's a great read, and there's no reason to be skeptical. Just read it.

              The CEO started the company in 2004 when he was 19 and now makes about $1,000,000 per year. He's going to reduce his own salary to $70,000 and raise the minimum that anyone in his company earns to $70,000. Obviously he's probably stashed away plenty, so he won't feel the effects of the lost $900,000+ for at least a year. He seems to be super financially conservative, so his own personal expenses are probably not extraordinary.

              It's an interesting experiment. I bet he gets a LOT of job applicants from here on out. :)
              Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!

              Comment


              • #8
                What's the free pub worth?

                Best. marketing. plan. Evar.
                "Don't measure yourself by what you have accomplished, but by what you should accomplish with your ability."
                -John Wooden

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Kung Wu View Post
                  It's an interesting experiment. I bet he gets a LOT of job applicants from here on out. :)
                  Exactly. Basic economics always win out. Supply and demand.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by SHOCKvalue View Post
                    I'd say any study that has average worker salary go from $32K to $52K in a single year suffers from something critically amiss.
                    In one article they take CEO pay as calculated by salary, bonus, stock options, AND stock options exercised (that's double dipping two years worth of stock earnings IMO) versus the average union workers pay ($30K+). In the other article it's the same CEO info vs average non-supervising employee pay ($50K+).

                    The CEO pool is the top 50 by sales in one instance (big bonus year) versus the 350 highest earners in another (again probably big bonuses).

                    In one instance, the estimate was put together by a left leaning think tank (bias) and in the other by a union lobbying group (bias). In both instances, the employee bonuses (probably 5% average) and the benefits (probably 20-30% average) are left out, causing a huge skew which would drop the actual difference (along with stocks exercised removed) down to about 100 times the average employee earnings. When you look at the average CEO (not the wealthiest) in an average year (where bonuses are minimum) you are probably looking at an average earnings of 10 times the earnings of all employees, and 20-25 times that of a union worker.

                    Also, they are comparing CEOs of the best company's versus average national information. Who's to say that these company's don't pay great?
                    Last edited by wufan; April 19, 2015, 10:28 AM.
                    Livin the dream

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Is there more to the story?

                      You may have heard about the Seattle CEO&nbsp; who cut his own $1 million salary to pay all his employees at least $70,000 a&nbsp;year. In case you missed it, here's how&nbsp; The New York Times &nbsp; reported the news last week: The idea began percolating, said Dan Price, the f
                      "Don't measure yourself by what you have accomplished, but by what you should accomplish with your ability."
                      -John Wooden

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X