Chen honored as Royals Pitcher of the Year
This doesn't surprise me. I think a good case could have been made for Holland, but being a reliever who isn't a closer pretty much meant he wouldn't get it.
C'mon Chen!
Interesting trade rumor at the bottom of the article. If Dayton takes it, he better not sacrifice Wil Myers for this guy...
Adding Pitchers Through Free Agency
KANSAS CITY -- Bruce Chen is one of those low-profile but lethal left-handers that sneak up on teams. Sometimes they don't see him coming until they're lulled into defeat.
Who did fans expect to top the 2010 Royals in victories? Sure, Zack Greinke. How about 2011? Luke Hochevar, probably. Sound the buzzer. Both years it was Chen, each time with 12 victories. Think you were surprised?
"It surprised me a lot," Chen said.
Who did fans expect to top the 2010 Royals in victories? Sure, Zack Greinke. How about 2011? Luke Hochevar, probably. Sound the buzzer. Both years it was Chen, each time with 12 victories. Think you were surprised?
"It surprised me a lot," Chen said.
C'mon Chen!
It was a pick that lacked imagination, but Bruce Chen was named as the Royals Pitcher of the Year on Thursday.
I say that because there’s always two options among the writers when voting: Starters and closers. That’s usually the way it should be in these things. (Although, if you know me, you know I think the closer has to be pretty damn exceptional to get votes.) So that’s the problem with the Royals this year. The rotation was extremely limited: Hochevar had a solid second half and Paulino showed flashes, but that was pretty much it. And we know about the closer.
So the writers chose the guy who missed part of the year with injury, but was fairly steady when he took the ball.
You won’t get an argument from me that Chen was the Royals best starter for the entire 2011 season, but was he the Royals best pitcher? I say no. That would have been Greg Holland.
I say that because there’s always two options among the writers when voting: Starters and closers. That’s usually the way it should be in these things. (Although, if you know me, you know I think the closer has to be pretty damn exceptional to get votes.) So that’s the problem with the Royals this year. The rotation was extremely limited: Hochevar had a solid second half and Paulino showed flashes, but that was pretty much it. And we know about the closer.
So the writers chose the guy who missed part of the year with injury, but was fairly steady when he took the ball.
You won’t get an argument from me that Chen was the Royals best starter for the entire 2011 season, but was he the Royals best pitcher? I say no. That would have been Greg Holland.
Adding Pitchers Through Free Agency
Ask nearly anyone about the Royals and they will tell you something along the lines of:
“If they can get a couple of starting pitchers they can compete.”
That’s a pretty fair statement, however the issue is WHERE do you get these pitchers. It is obviously a glaring problem but there are only three ways to upgrade any position.
1. Free Agency
2. Trade
3. Development
Today, I’m going to focus on the first item on the list. It’s one of the ways that is most talked about because it SEEMS like a simple solution to an obvious problem. If only the rich so-and-so’s who run the team would spend money on free agents, then this team wouldn’t suck. It’s a statement that is as wrong as it is simple, but it’s easy to see the logic used.
First, lets take a look at what kind of pitchers have been available in the past via free agency. Here is a list I found of every free agent starting pitcher available last season, the money they were paid and their fWAR:
“If they can get a couple of starting pitchers they can compete.”
That’s a pretty fair statement, however the issue is WHERE do you get these pitchers. It is obviously a glaring problem but there are only three ways to upgrade any position.
1. Free Agency
2. Trade
3. Development
Today, I’m going to focus on the first item on the list. It’s one of the ways that is most talked about because it SEEMS like a simple solution to an obvious problem. If only the rich so-and-so’s who run the team would spend money on free agents, then this team wouldn’t suck. It’s a statement that is as wrong as it is simple, but it’s easy to see the logic used.
First, lets take a look at what kind of pitchers have been available in the past via free agency. Here is a list I found of every free agent starting pitcher available last season, the money they were paid and their fWAR:
Comment