Possible line up in 16-17

[wufan]

PG: Henderson, 6-3
SG: Shamet, 6-4
SF: Brown, 6-6
PF: Hamilton, 6-9
C: Nurger, 6-11

Bench
PG: Taylor, 6-3
SG: Holland, 6-0
SF:
PF: Kelly, 6-7
C: Morris, 6-8

McDuffie fits in nicely. Will need another big post as well.

[forevershockerfan]

From watching Kelly and Hamilton play once, along with their highlights clips etc, I would have Kelly on the 1st team. Taylor and Henderson will be quite the battle for the starting position in 16-17.

[wufan]

From watching Kelly and Hamilton play once, along with their highlights clips etc, I would have Kelly on the 1st team. Taylor and Henderson will be quite the battle for the starting position in 16-17.

I almost went that way, but since I have no clue who will be the better players, I just went with height. To add to your point, it would also make more sense to play Hamilton with Morris to better balance out the differences in height, weight, and perimeter scoring ability.

[pogo]

I didn't see anyone named Carr or McDaniel on that list. Still hoping.

[jdshock]

I think if Morris is not starting for us his junior year (his fourth year in the program), we are in a really good place or he has really struggled. Even so, with Hamilton and Nurger I find it hard to think Morris will start... which means we will be in a really good place I guess.

[wufan]

I think if Morris is not starting for us his junior year (his fourth year in the program), we are in a really good place or he has really struggled. Even so, with Hamilton and Nurger I find it hard to think Morris will start... which means we will be in a really good place I guess.

Just conjecture as none of the named players have played a minute of D-I ball.

[WuDrWu]

sigh

[WSUwatcher]

Well, I agree, Doc; that's quite the telescoped view. But this is Shockernet and it is the offseason.

This is what happens when you don't have football -- although it could be worse; we could have KU football, in which case you could have this stuff in the basketball forum AND flames in the football forum. I never look at other people's boards, but I can't imagine the ether is a very happy place in NE Kansas these days.

[MadaboutWu]

I actually like threads like this. Making it a rotation chart is obviously silly but it's a bit of harmless fun to run through future rosters.

[wufan]

I actually like threads like this. Making it a rotation chart is obviously silly but it's a bit of harmless fun to run through future rosters.

Agreed. These things are Never relevant nor correct. Now, if I had gotten a fix on the conjecture that is pick-up games, perhaps I wouldn't be compelled to post this. The other interesting thing about this is that the sophomore class is completely vacant.

[im4wsu]

Agreed. These things are Never relevant nor correct. Now, if I had gotten a fix on the conjecture that is pick-up games, perhaps I wouldn't be compelled to post this. The other interesting thing about this is that the sophomore class is completely vacant.

But it should be in the basketball forum rather than recruiting.

[WSUwatcher]

Agreed, im4. Personally, I think it's silly, wildly premature fantasizing, but for those who want to pursue it this is the wrong forum, because it isn't related to recruiting any particular player. Perhaps the moderators can help with a move to Men's Basketball, where it belongs?

By the way, a vacant class is not a first under Marshall, and he's shown a fairly amazing ability to fill in the vacancy.

[pinstripers]

But it should be in the basketball forum rather than recruiting.

yes, please

[wufan]

yes, please

I don't care where it's posted. I was actually just putting this out there to see how our size stacked up by position. Once you see that, then it becomes apparent where the coaching staff might focus recruiting. It's similar to what verbal commits does, but cleaner for my purpose.

[Bob Sacamano]

I refuse to participate unless we are talking about line-ups after the year 2021.