Originally posted by SHOXMVC
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Stutz Injury News
Collapse
X
-
"I not sure that I've ever been around a more competitive player or young man than Fred VanVleet. I like to win more than 99.9% of the people in this world, but he may top me." -- Gregg Marshall 12/23/13 :peaceful:
---------------------------------------
Remember when Nancy Pelosi said about Obamacare:
"We have to pass it, to find out what's in it".
A physician called into a radio show and said:
"That's the definition of a stool sample."
-
Garrett has been less effective in help defense on drives by guards than some of our other big men, but he has been very good about defending post players.
One problem with him being out for Drake is how well he handled Van Deest in Wichita. He consistently pushed him out of good post-up position and most of the points Van Deest scored were against JT not Garrett."Cotton scared me - I left him alone." - B4MSU (Bear Nation poster) in reference to heckling players
Comment
-
Originally posted by im4wsuOriginally posted by SHOXMVCOriginally posted by im4wsuOriginally posted by 1979ShockerIt was kind of a wash when Garrett wasn't able to play in the Creighton game. As Coach Marshall says, Garrett gives up as many points as he scores. We would have scored more points against Creighton with him in there, but would have given up more.
The only advantage of having Stutz available would be in the rotation and I think that would have counteracted any scoring problems we might have faced.
IMHO, Stutz can look very bad once or twice a game and our memories focus on those occasions. He makes some very good plays as well, but those aren't as memorable (nooo fancy blocks, just standing there keeping the ball out of the basket). How many times when he has looked bad was he helping on someone else's assignment? How many times when he helps out like that does it work out for WSU's benefit?
I sure wish I had the ability to do the plus/minus this season, because I'd bet YOUR HOUSE that Garrett is doing better this year than last year. To indicate his improvement during last season, while his per 40 plus minus decreased from 11.9 to 5.4 respectively for the first 17 games and the last 18 games, the team's corresponding numbers decreased from 14.1 to 1.4.
That shows Garrett was performing less than the team in the first 17 games and 4.0 better than the team in the last 18 games.
im4wsu:
"How many times when he has looked bad was he helping on someone else's assignment?" - All other bigs are in the same boat and generally do a better job than Garrett. Let's be honest, Garrett looks like "Lurch" when being the last line of defense. He rarely attempts to block the shot, but stands with his arms in the air and looking like he's just been told by the sherrif to "reach for the sky son."
Just keep in mind when doing the analytical commentary, who is on the court with Garrett at the time can certainly skew what the real picture is. Don't get me wrong, I like Garrett, however his ceiling is much less than what we thought initially. He is an asset to the team, but in very much moderation.
I agree with Hatter in that when Garrett is posed with an adaquite matchup, his post defense has improved.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Mad HatterGarrett has been less effective in help defense on drives by guards than some of our other big men, but he has been very good about defending post players.
One problem with him being out for Drake is how well he handled Van Deest in Wichita. He consistently pushed him out of good post-up position and most of the points Van Deest scored were against JT not Garrett.Kansas is Flat. The Earth is Not!!
Comment
-
I'm glad to hear Garrett's injury doesn't involve any structural damage and hopefully the staff can choose his minutes carefully and get him back to 100% soon. He has definitely overcome most of his early struggles on offense and we'll need the big fella for the stretch run.
Get well, Garrett!
--'85.Basketball Season Tix since '77-78 . . . . . . Baseball Season Tix since '88
Comment
Comment