NCAA investigating Butler after Calipari complains

[1979Shocker]

From the Drake Report:

Nonetheless, simply
weighing graduation rates and/or academic progress rates (APRs) as part of tournament eligibility
would shine a light on the NCAA cartel's operations and pressure the NCAA to not only comply
with its basic purpose and its principle of amateurism,3 but also comply with the tax-exempt
requirement that its athletes be legitimate degree-seeking students that are maintained as an
integral part of their school’s student bodies—or else risk loosing its tax exempt status.

These are supposed to be intelligent people and they've apparently set out to prove that it is impossible to spell the any form of the word "lose" correctly on the Internet.
I don't mind stuff like that on messaage boards or informal conversations, but not from a group that should know how to use a freaking spell checker.

Sometimes you just need better proof readers.

I ran the Drake Report quote above through the Spell and Grammar checker of MS Word and it didn't find any spelling and grammar errors.

[kcshocker11]

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: 8) :posterwsu:

[im4wsu]

From the Drake Report:

Nonetheless, simply
weighing graduation rates and/or academic progress rates (APRs) as part of tournament eligibility
would shine a light on the NCAA cartel's operations and pressure the NCAA to not only comply
with its basic purpose and its principle of amateurism,3 but also comply with the tax-exempt
requirement that its athletes be legitimate degree-seeking students that are maintained as an
integral part of their school’s student bodies—or else risk loosing its tax exempt status.

These are supposed to be intelligent people and they've apparently set out to prove that it is impossible to spell the any form of the word "lose" correctly on the Internet.
I don't mind stuff like that on messaage boards or informal conversations, but not from a group that should know how to use a freaking spell checker.

Sometimes you just need better proof readers.

I ran the Drake Report quote above through the Spell and Grammar checker of MS Word and it didn't find any spelling and grammar errors.

Tha's because "loosing" is a word, just not the appropriate one in this instance.

[1979Shocker]

From the Drake Report:

Nonetheless, simply
weighing graduation rates and/or academic progress rates (APRs) as part of tournament eligibility
would shine a light on the NCAA cartel's operations and pressure the NCAA to not only comply
with its basic purpose and its principle of amateurism,3 but also comply with the tax-exempt
requirement that its athletes be legitimate degree-seeking students that are maintained as an
integral part of their school’s student bodies—or else risk loosing its tax exempt status.

These are supposed to be intelligent people and they've apparently set out to prove that it is impossible to spell the any form of the word "lose" correctly on the Internet.
I don't mind stuff like that on messaage boards or informal conversations, but not from a group that should know how to use a freaking spell checker.

Sometimes you just need better proof readers.

I ran the Drake Report quote above through the Spell and Grammar checker of MS Word and it didn't find any spelling and grammar errors.

Tha's because "loosing" is a word, just not the appropriate one in this instance.

I know. MS Word's grammar checker wasn't good enough to know that. That's why you need proof readers.