Originally posted by WSUShokker
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Butler and St. Louis
Collapse
X
-
I still don't understand the fascination with St. LouisInfinity Art Glass - Fantastic local artist and Shocker fan
RIP Guy Always A Shocker
Carpenter Place - A blessing to many young girls/women
ICT S.O.S - Great local cause fighting against human trafficking
Wartick Insurance Agency - Saved me money with more coverage.
Save Shocker Sports - A rallying cry
Comment
-
Originally posted by im4wsuOriginally posted by forevershockerfanMaybe someday we can add a couple of key Schools to the Valley that would enhance our Conference. It also seems prudent to start approaching the key Mid-Majors that are on the rise and Dancing in March, to see if we can continue to strengthen our schedule and maybe get more games on the tube with possible National coverage?
Comment
-
Originally posted by SubGod22I still don't understand the fascination with St. LouisKU fans are the most arrogant while KSU fans are the most delusional. ~BostonWu
Criticizing this team is like criticizing one of Jerry's kids. ~DaShox
Comment
-
Let's look at the bottom half - RPI-wise - of three leagues:
First the MVC:
107 - Bradley
108 - Creighton
166 - SIU
181 - Drake
245 - Evansville
Mtn. West (3 bids):
132 - Colorado St.
168 - Utah
192 - TCU
238 - Wyoming
247 - Air Force
A-10 (3 bids):
111 - Duquesne
149 - Geo Wash
155 - St. Bonaventure
171 - UMass
173 - LaSalle
302 - Fordham
If you add Butler (7) and St. Louis (75) to the MVC, you're pulling up the RPI of all teams and giving the opportunity for more quality wins. You don't have to replace anyone. Heck, every league needs a couple of doormats, and just about every league has them. Only the Big12, ACC and Big East don't have more than one RPI bottom-feeder (150+).
Butler doesn't belong in the Horizon anymore because there really aren't any teams there that are going to challenge them anytime soon. At least Gonzaga has St. Mary's. The Bulldogs would be a good fit in the basketball league that is the MVC. St. Louis would just be a quality throw-in to keep an even number.
If WSU isn't going to be able to add football and position itself for a jump to a better conference, then we need to try and make the MVC as good as we can. I know a lot of people want Dayton and Xavier, but they have no reason to jump. They have a pretty good thing going in the A-10.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RoyalShockLet's look at the bottom half - RPI-wise - of three leagues:
First the MVC:
107 - Bradley
108 - Creighton
166 - SIU
181 - Drake
245 - Evansville
Mtn. West (3 bids):
132 - Colorado St.
168 - Utah
192 - TCU
238 - Wyoming
247 - Air Force
A-10 (3 bids):
111 - Duquesne
149 - Geo Wash
155 - St. Bonaventure
171 - UMass
173 - LaSalle
302 - Fordham
If you add Butler (7) and St. Louis (75) to the MVC, you're pulling up the RPI of all teams and giving the opportunity for more quality wins. You don't have to replace anyone. Heck, every league needs a couple of doormats, and just about every league has them. Only the Big12, ACC and Big East don't have more than one RPI bottom-feeder (150+).
Butler doesn't belong in the Horizon anymore because there really aren't any teams there that are going to challenge them anytime soon. At least Gonzaga has St. Mary's. The Bulldogs would be a good fit in the basketball league that is the MVC. St. Louis would just be a quality throw-in to keep an even number.
If WSU isn't going to be able to add football and position itself for a jump to a better conference, then we need to try and make the MVC as good as we can. I know a lot of people want Dayton and Xavier, but they have no reason to jump. They have a pretty good thing going in the A-10.
Good points, Royal but the Mountain West got 4 bids not 3 (all 4 of their teams not listed above got a bid- they had great separation between their top 4 teams and the bottom 5, helping them to get multiple bids). Their overall conference rpi was almost the same as the Valley, but they had separation and we didn't.
Comment
-
My bad on the bid number.
I guess my summary points are:
1. The idea that adding two quality teams will just mean more "beating up on one another" is a myth. That's part of the purpose of RPI, to gauge the quality of wins and losses. Adding two quality RPI teams (SLU is borderline but better than MVC average in a year with a very young team) isn't going to hurt.
2. We don't need to replace two teams to keep a magic number of 10. We may like the balanced schedule, but if the price is that we struggle to get multiple bids and national respect, it's not worth it. At least, that's my opinion.
3. The MVC needs to get stronger and there is some strength in numbers. Without FBS football, the conference (and it's member schools) needs as much strength as it can get should there continue to be conference realignment.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RoyalShockMy bad on the bid number.
I guess my summary points are:
1. The idea that adding two quality teams will just mean more "beating up on one another" is a myth. That's part of the purpose of RPI, to gauge the quality of wins and losses. Adding two quality RPI teams (SLU is borderline but better than MVC average in a year with a very young team) isn't going to hurt.
2. We don't need to replace two teams to keep a magic number of 10. We may like the balanced schedule, but if the price is that we struggle to get multiple bids and national respect, it's not worth it. At least, that's my opinion.
3. The MVC needs to get stronger and there is some strength in numbers. Without FBS football, the conference (and it's member schools) needs as much strength as it can get should there continue to be conference realignment.
Possible MVC divisions:
East - Butler, Ill St, SIU, Bradley, In St, and Evansville.
West - WSU, MSU, Creighton, UNI, St. Louis, and Drake.
Comment
Comment