Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Worst Loss in the history of the program

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Maybe the team was looking ahead to Utah State

    Tough loss tonight....
    Marshall has to dig deep because Saturday Night is going to be a tough game.
    What You gonna do when ShockerMania Runs wild on You!!!!!!

    Comment


    • #17
      Chins up, gents.

      The kids'll get it back together.

      Sometimes you're just the bug.
      You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by USU78
        Chins up, gents.

        The kids'll get it back together.

        Sometimes you're just the bug.
        I seriously doubt you would be happy go-lucky if USU got beat at Hawaii for example. But even that is not a fair comparison, Hawaii isn't winless in their conference and had not lost 14 in a row.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by USU78
          Chins up, gents.

          The kids'll get it back together.

          Sometimes you're just the bug.
          WSU fans have seen it coming. The only thing consistent with this team was they can't play a full 40 minutes.

          Comment


          • #20
            j;lkjewwgfi;jaasg'ioagnlsfkj;lnerw;iofhaiou;ernhgv oan;rgvolaengvoaeinvloanvjanbv;iunhaeiu;obnar;oiuv n!!!
            “Let your plans be dark and impenetrable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt.”
            -Sun Tzu, The Art of War

            Comment


            • #21
              Box score for the Evansville Purple Aces vs. Wichita State Shockers NCAAM game from February 9, 2010 on ESPN. Includes all points, rebounds and steals stats.
              "Prediction is very difficult, especially if it is about the future."

              --Niels Bohr







              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Ricardo del Rio
                Thanks!
                SFL is back!

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by kochHead
                  j;lkjewwgfi;jaasg'ioagnlsfkj;lnerw;iofhaiou;ernhgv oan;rgvolaengvoaeinvloanvjanbv;iunhaeiu;obnar;oiuv n!!!
                  I would tend to agree . . . but on the other hand ;alkbfj eao ent[e]a]e]nt peh pabeh
                  You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Ricardo del Rio
                    I am sure it has been mentioned 50 times, but Stutz: 19 minutes, 15 points, zero fouls. Evansville had no answer to him, everyone was in foul trouble, and he doesn't re-enter the game until 13 minutes left in the 2nd half. I'm at a loss here.

                    And yes, this is probably the most disappointing loss I can remember in 20 years of following the Shocks closely. And having been a fan through the 90's, that's saying a lot. :-x

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by cjp27
                      Originally posted by Ricardo del Rio
                      I am sure it has been mentioned 50 times, but Stutz: 19 minutes, 15 points, zero fouls. Evansville had no answer to him, everyone was in foul trouble, and he doesn't re-enter the game until 13 minutes left in the 2nd half. I'm at a loss here.

                      And yes, this is probably the most disappointing loss I can remember in 20 years of following the Shocks closely. And having been a fan through the 90's, that's saying a lot. :-x
                      I think that's one HCGM should address.

                      Like it or not, the buck stops with the head coach. A coach gets to ride the waves of team success with most everyone feeling he's pushing the right buttons -- the record proves it (so to speak).

                      When things go soooo far south, as in the last two games, points like above should get some respect and answers by the coaching staff.

                      Comment


                      • #26

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          In my opinion, the starting lineup and eight to ten man rotations need to be shaken up.

                          Starters:
                          1)Hannah
                          2)Murry
                          3)Hatch
                          4)Durley
                          5)Stutz/Blair

                          Bench(In order of playing time):
                          6)Blair/Stutz
                          7)Williams
                          8)Ellis
                          9)Kyles
                          10)Manigault

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by ShockerEngr
                            Back at ya!

                            Note that incoherence or pointlessness is required for a proper WHARRGARBL reference. An angry, but otherwise logical, argument is not a WHARRGARBL.

                            I'm pretty sure my comment is not incoherent. cjp27's comment of GS's playing time and when, given his effectiveness, is a good question that logic cannot easily explain.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by ShockTalk

                              Back at ya!

                              Note that incoherence or pointlessness is required for a proper WHARRGARBL reference. An angry, but otherwise logical, argument is not a WHARRGARBL.

                              I'm pretty sure my comment is not incoherent. cjp27's comment of GS's playing time and when, given his effectiveness, is a good question that logic cannot easily explain.
                              I know...and there are many reasonable arguments going on,

                              But two reasons for the WHARRGARBL
                              a) I had no coherent response to tonights game
                              b) The team had no coherent response to E-ville

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by ShockerEngr
                                Originally posted by ShockTalk

                                Back at ya!

                                Note that incoherence or pointlessness is required for a proper WHARRGARBL reference. An angry, but otherwise logical, argument is not a WHARRGARBL.

                                I'm pretty sure my comment is not incoherent. cjp27's comment of GS's playing time and when, given his effectiveness, is a good question that logic cannot easily explain.
                                I know...and there are many reasonable arguments going on,

                                But two reasons for the WHARRGARBL
                                a) I had no coherent response to tonights game
                                b) The team had no coherent response to E-ville
                                :yes:

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X