Originally posted by MTXE
However, then taking that and running with it, postulating some fairly derogatory sentences concerning a public figure that all on this board seem to have a fairly great impression of, appears to have grown less out of a desire for discussion and more out of a desire for contrariness.
It would have taken one sentence to put forth your theory. And you took it.
But then you added several sentences which were formulated with the assumption that your theory was correct.
Yes, most posts in this thread have been written in assumption of a correct theory. However, all but yours have at least concerned the facts as a basis, and those facts came from the person you're trying to defend.
Comment