Pitt vs Texas

[kcshocker11]

tied 32 to 32 first half

34 to 32 Pitt halftime

[kcshocker11]

43 to 41 Pitt little over 15 min

[kcshocker11]

510to 51 10:48 left

[OKC Shocker]

Pitt better be careful this could get out of hand fast. They need a shot and if this was last night it would be Woodall or Gibbs.

[kcshocker11]

63 to 54 6:41 left Texas

[kcshocker11]

Texas pulling away Pitt down by 12

[ShockerFever]

Game, set, match.

[vbird53]

Texas is Ath-a-letic

[kcshocker11]

78 to 62 Texas Wins
70 to 48 Nebraska over UMKC

[im4wsu]

Anybody read the KC Star article about UT-Pitt game? Besides giving the score in the 1st paragraph and a brief stat in about the third to last paragraph, the ENTIRE article was about KU fans and players attending and potential KU-UT player match-ups. A total INSULT to the Panthers.

[Awesome Sauce Malone]

How so? The article you speak of is just doing what it was intended to do - Hype the KU and Texas matchup. KU fans got the chance to check out the competition rather than wait to see them.

Im not sure how the print edition looked but there is coverage of the game itself to be found online. Beside do you really think the general public cares one iota about Texas or Pittsburgh? This was nothing more than the equivalent of a Bob Lutz article in the Eagle.

[im4wsu]

How so? The article you speak of is just doing what it was intended to do - Hype the KU and Texas matchup. KU fans got the chance to check out the competition rather than wait to see them.

Im not sure how the print edition looked but there is coverage of the game itself to be found online. Beside do you really think the general public cares one iota about Texas or Pittsburgh? This was nothing more than the equivalent of a Bob Lutz article in the Eagle.

Would you feel this way if you were a Pitt player who had travelled 800 miles to compete in a tournament; or a Texas player/fan who won the tournament?

Nothing wrong with writing the "column", but it should have been separate from the game article.

[Awesome Sauce Malone]

you mean like this

http://www.kansascity.com/sports/story/1592588.html

http://www.kansascity.com/472/story/1592647.html

http://www.kansascity.com/472/story/1592613.html

The article you seem to be upset with was not a game article.

[BOBB]

How so? The article you speak of is just doing what it was intended to do - Hype the KU and Texas matchup. KU fans got the chance to check out the competition rather than wait to see them.

Im not sure how the print edition looked but there is coverage of the game itself to be found online. Beside do you really think the general public cares one iota about Texas or Pittsburgh? This was nothing more than the equivalent of a Bob Lutz article in the Eagle.

Would you feel this way if you were a Pitt player who had travelled 800 miles to compete in a tournament; or a Texas player/fan who won the tournament?

Nothing wrong with writing the "column", but it should have been separate from the game article.

I'd be pretty pissed if I was a Pitt player reading the Pittsburgh paper. I probably wouldn't give a damn what the KC Star had to say.

[kcshocker11]

How so? The article you speak of is just doing what it was intended to do - Hype the KU and Texas matchup. KU fans got the chance to check out the competition rather than wait to see them.

Im not sure how the print edition looked but there is coverage of the game itself to be found online. Beside do you really think the general public cares one iota about Texas or Pittsburgh? This was nothing more than the equivalent of a Bob Lutz article in the Eagle.

Would you feel this way if you were a Pitt player who had travelled 800 miles to compete in a tournament; or a Texas player/fan who won the tournament?

Nothing wrong with writing the "column", but it should have been separate from the game article.

I'd be pretty pissed if I was a Pitt player reading the Pittsburgh paper. I probably wouldn't give a damn what the KC Star had to say.

:good: 8) :posterwsu: