If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
The league has consistently hurt Memphis in their bids for high seeds in the NCAA's.
Not true Fever. Memphis was a #1 seed in 2006, a #2 seed in 2007, a #1 seed in 2008 and a #2 seed in 2009. Calipari took over at Memphis in the 2000-2001 season. It took him five seasons to turn them into a national power. However, it was not until after Marquette, Cincinnati and Louisville left C-USA to go to the Big East after the 2005 season that Memphis really started having their success. Considering that information you could actually make an argument that playing in a weaker conference actually helped Memphis's seeding because it made their overall record so good.
You're right 771. I should have worded it differently. The weaker conference does help inflating their record and I guess what I meant by "hurting" them was this past tourney, where they could've been a No.1 seed by everyone talked about how weak C-USA was as a counter point.
But the point being, in terms of the overall worth of the conference, the Valley beats out C-USA.. IMO.
Deuces Valley.
... No really, deuces.
________________
"Enjoy the ride."
Comment