Originally posted by Jamar Howard 4 President
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2017-2018 Bracketology
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Jamar Howard 4 President View PostIt is easy to forget, as we root for Cincy, that they are competing with WSU on the S-Curve. As long as they are ahead of WSU, as they are currently, I'm rooting against them.
I've given up rooting that WSU will pass folks like Villanova, Virginia , or Purdue, but I'm rooting against pretty much anyone currently ranked between 10-30. These teams are the true competition for the Shox.
(Yes, I know Cincy is #8 in the polls, but most bracketologists don't have them quite that high, and also, WSU has a unique opportunity to catch them since they have 2-3 games head to head.)
Cincy's defense is good, don't get me wrong, but from what I have watched. They have benefited from the other team missing LOTS of open looks. Maybe they weren't the looks they were hoping for, but they still were open.
In Cincy's first 8 conference games, only 1 of those games have come against a team that currently ranks in the top half of the AAC in AdjO (SMU). They obviously won that game, but they now have 7 of 10 against teams in the top half (WSU x2, Houston x2, SMU, Tulsa, Tulane) of AdjO. Will be interesting to see how their defense holds up. So far, the only 2 teams they have played that have anywhere near the AdjO of WSU (15) were Xavier (9) and Florida (19). Both of those were losses.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Their schedule definitely gets tougher. So does ours. I think it's a mistake to play the "missed a bunch of shots" card. Teams have played that card after losses to WSU for 7+ years. Sometimes it's a coincidence, and teams really do just miss shots. But not when it's every game, as is the case with Cincy this year. They are for real.
They have also applied their defense to 2 teams twice already, Temple and Memphis, likely helping to destroy their AdjO numbers.
-
Like i said, their defense is good. But take the Memphis game for example. That was a very close game up until the last few minutes. If Memphis doesn't shoot 50% from the line on nearly 30 attempts ... it's a different game. Can't credit the defense for that. 3-17 from 3 didn't help and a lot were wide open.
- Likes 1
-
You can choose not to credit the defense. I will choose to credit the defense. Getting crushed by a defense all game becomes mental. Your few open shots become extremely important, and often rushed. Your free throws come on tired legs after you haven't seen the ball go through the hoop in 4 minutes. It adds up. If it didn't, WSU wouldn't have won 80%+ of its games the last 8 years, and I don't think that was on luck either.
- Likes 2
-
"Early February Projection of the Field of 68" - Bleacher Report
BY KERRY MILLER
FEBRUARY 5, 2018
The Purdue Boilermakers have battled through several close calls recently, but they remain cemented on the No. 1 line in our latest projection of the 2018 men's NCAA tournament...
On the Horizon
SMU Mustangs: SMU has a couple of great wins over Arizona and Wichita State, but the bad losses to Tulsa, Tulane, Temple and Northern Iowa are the overpowering smell coming from this resume.
Last 5 In
2nd-to-Last: Temple Owls
13-10, RPI: 42, KP: 88, SOS: 2
Remember, the bar for sneaking into the field has been lowered. If you find that hard to believe, just wait until we get to the First 5 Out slide.
Temple has several dreadful losses: George Washington, La Salle, Memphis and Tulane. Temple also has three extremely impressive wins: neutral-court games against Clemson and Auburn and a home game against Wichita State. Yes, 10 losses is a lot, but the Owls played one of the toughest schedules in the country, and Vanderbilt got in as a No. 9 seed with 15 losses in the same scenario last year. A 6-2 record the rest of the way should be more than enough for Temple.
5th-to-Last: Houston Cougars
17-5, RPI: 41, KP: 35, SOS: 104
Houston missed out on a huge opportunity against Cincinnati Wednesday, but the Cougars did win a road game against UCF. Compared to every other team that was within a few spots of the previous edition's cut line, that's one heck of a good week. They still play SMU twice, host Cincinnati and play at Temple, so there are a few opportunities remaining to improve this resume.
Midwest Region: Dallas
No. 3 Cincinnati vs. No. 14 UC Santa Barbara
No. 6 Florida State vs. No. 11 Arkansas
South Region: Charlotte, North Carolina
No. 1 Virginia vs. No. 16 UNC-Asheville
No. 8 Wichita State vs. No. 9 Texas A&M
Comment
-
ESPN Bracketology
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-bas...l/bracketology
Posted: 02/015/18
SOUTH REGION
#5 - Wichita State vs #12 - Louisiana in Boise, Idaho
#3 - Cincinnati vs #14 - Belmont in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
EAST REGION
#11 Houston vs #6 - Seton Hall in Dallas, Texas
FIRST FOUR OUT
SMU
Comment
-
CBS Bracketology
By Jerry Palm
UPDATED: Feb 05, 6:20am
CBS Sports is helping you get ready for March Madness with the latest news, picks, and predictions for the 2025 NCAA Basketball Tournament Bracket.
WEST REGION
#8 - Wichita State vs #9 - New Mexico State in Detroit, Michigan
MIDWEST REGION
#3 - Cincinnati vs #14 - Montana in Dallas, Texas
EAST REGION
#11 Houston vs #6 - Michigan in Nashville, Tennessee
LAST TEAM IN
#11 SMU Play-in game in Dayton, Ohio
Comment
-
NBC Sports Bracketology
UPDATED: February 5, 2018
Find all the latest college basketball news, live coverage, videos, highlights, stats, predictions, and results right here on NBC Sports.
FIRST FOUR PAIRINGS – Dayton (First Round)
11) Houston vs. 11) Kansas State | Midwest Region
EAST REGION
3) CINCINNATI vs. 14) VERMONT in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
SOUTH REGION
8) Wichita State vs. 9) TCU in Detroit, Michigan
Comment
-
Brad Evans, college sports expert at a Yahoo Sports, was interviewed on Omaha sports radio today and commented about the Shockers. Said if tournament was today they are 6-9 seed and probably 6-7. Said he thought the bones of the resume’ are good and the brand-name could help them with seeding. Said it would help them if committee uses metrics other than RPI such as Sagarin, Kenpom, etc.
Comment
-
The 2018 Bracket Matrix
Bracketmatrix 12/1 1/1 1/15 1/20 1/30 2/7 Seed 1 1 2 1 Seed 2 10 8 19 12 Seed 3 10 8 26 24 2 Seed 4 2 13 18 20 8 4 Seed 5 1 10 12 14 32 10 Seed 6 4 2 12 42 20 Seed 7 1 1 1 5 13 26 Seed 8 1 6 21 Seed 9 2 1 1 12 Seed 10 5 Seed 11 1 2 Not Rated 1 Totals 25 46 80 90 105 101 Seed 1 4% 3% 1% Seed 2 40% 17% 24% 13% Seed 3 40% 17% 33% 27% 2% Seed 4 8% 28% 23% 22% 8% 4% Seed 5 4% 22% 15% 16% 30% 10% Seed 6 9% 3% 13% 40% 20% Seed 7 4% 2% 1% 6% 12% 26% Seed 8 1% 6% 21% Seed 9 4% 1% 1% 12% Seed 10 5% Seed 11 1% 2% Not Rated 1% Totals 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Overall 2 Seed 4-Seed 3-Seed 4-Seed 6-Seed 7-seed Average 2.84 4.15 3.36 4.12 5.80 7.18
Comment
-
"NCAA tournament bracketology" - USA TODAY
By Shelby Mast and Scott Gleeson Sports
Published 9:50 a.m. ET Feb. 7, 2018 | Updated 11:39 a.m. ET
As March Madness nears, the SEC has two new teams atop the standings that no one expected to see there. What's that mean for NCAA tournament seeding?
#4 Cincinnati vs #13 Vermont in San Diego, California
#8 Wichita State vs. #9 TCU in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
First Four Out
Houston
Comment
-
"NCAA Tournament bracket projection" - Sporting News
By Ryan Fagan
Posted: 02/07/18, Updated at 3:34 p.m. ET
http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-bas...v1nxnp91dbyb8j
No. 3 seeds
Cincinnati (22-2): Pom/RPI/KPI: 4/11/9. vs. Q1: 4-2. vs. Q2: 8-0. vs. Q3/4: 10–0
No. 5 seeds
Oklahoma (16-7): Pom/RPI/KPI: 26/19/14. vs. Q1: 5-6. vs. Q2: 3-1. vs. Q3/4: 8-0
No. 7 seeds
Wichita State (18-5): Pom/RPI/KPI: 19/24/25. vs. Q1: 1-3. vs. Q2: 9-2. vs. Q3/4: 8-0 - Wichita State has a nice collection of good, not great, wins, but nothing resembling a bad loss. Still, if the Shockers want to avoid that 8/9 game, they should avoid getting swept by Cincinnati (both games are still ahead).
No. 10 seeds
Houston (17-5): Pom/RPI/KPI: 35/37/45. vs. Q1: 3-2. vs. Q2: 2-2. vs. Q3/4: 12-1
No. 12 seeds
New Mexico State (WAC)
No. 14 seeds
Loyola-Chicago (Missouri Valley), South Dakota State (Summit)
No. 15 seeds
Florida Gulf Coast (Atlantic Sun), Charleston (Colonial)
First four out
SMU (15-8): Pom/RPI/KPI: 49/71/59. vs. Q1: 2-3. vs. Q2: 3-4. vs. Q3/4: 10-1
On Life Support (SN's pretty generous bubble (in alphabetical order):
Baylor (14-10): Pom/RPI/KPI: 40/72/78. vs. Q1: 1-7. vs. Q2: 2-3. vs. Q3/4: 10-0
Marquette (13-10): Pom/RPI/KPI: 50/61/55. vs. Q1: 2-8. vs. Q2: 2-2. vs. Q3/4: 9-0
Notre Dame (13-10): Pom/RPI/KPI: 42/76/73. vs. Q1: 2-5. vs. Q2: 2-3. vs. Q3/4: 9-2
Oklahoma State (14-10): Pom/RPI/KPI: 69/105/56. vs. Q1: 3-8. vs. Q2: 1-2. vs. Q3/4: 10-0
Temple (13-10): Pom/RPI/KPI: 86/34/38. vs. Q1: 4-6. vs. Q2: 3-0. vs. Q3/4: 6-4
Comment
Comment