The answer to why:
a) the Shockers got smoked against Oklahoma State (and Louisville, Michigan St.),
b) they will drop unexpected games to more MVC teams than we think,
c) our expectations for this season are too high,
d) it really isn't a coaching issue (unless we believe FVV and Baker should have played less minutes the last couple of years)
Here is a comparison of the total minutes of NCAA experience between our guards and OSU's.
If you compare the top 5 guards of each team based on minutes played last night it would be:
7,068 minutes for OSU to
1,912 minutes for WSU
I'm not going to do the same chart with Louisville and Michigan State -- I suspect the result would probably not be as drastic, but who knows?
The point is, ours is clearly a young squad and as such this is a rebuilding year, no matter how much we wanted to believe it's not.
Our guards are simply not experienced enough to make in game adjustments on the fly against very experienced big time guards. A halftime adjustment can happen, but even that will be suspect unless it happens to be defensive sets they have had enough time to really get coordinated on in practice.
Yet, even with our serious NCAA inexperience at the guard positions, we could still be dangerous toward the end of the season as our guards get more experience. It might just be at the NIT, but let's not throw in the towel just yet. And if it is the NIT, there is no shame in that given our youth and inexperience. We need to support this squad while they mature, difficult as it is to watch when it looks like the train wreck it does against experienced guards.
a) the Shockers got smoked against Oklahoma State (and Louisville, Michigan St.),
b) they will drop unexpected games to more MVC teams than we think,
c) our expectations for this season are too high,
d) it really isn't a coaching issue (unless we believe FVV and Baker should have played less minutes the last couple of years)
Here is a comparison of the total minutes of NCAA experience between our guards and OSU's.
name | min against shox | NCAA games | avg NCAA minutes | total NCAA minutes |
Carroll | 33 | 63 | 20 | 1260 |
Forte | 26 | 113 | 29 | 3277 |
Evans | 24 | 32 | 28 | 896 |
Averette | 19 | 11 | 15 | 165 |
Hammonds | 17 | 98 | 15 | 1470 |
Dziagwa | 15 | 10 | 10 | 100 |
Waters | 13 | 11 | 21 | 231 |
name | min against osu | ncaa games | avg ncaa minutes | total ncaa minutes |
Smith | 30 | 12 | 19 | 228 |
Frankamp | 17 | 67 | 14 | 938 |
Shamet | 17 | 15 | 21 | 315 |
Reaves | 9 | 11 | 13 | 143 |
Simon | 5 | 72 | 4 | 288 |
If you compare the top 5 guards of each team based on minutes played last night it would be:
7,068 minutes for OSU to
1,912 minutes for WSU
I'm not going to do the same chart with Louisville and Michigan State -- I suspect the result would probably not be as drastic, but who knows?
The point is, ours is clearly a young squad and as such this is a rebuilding year, no matter how much we wanted to believe it's not.
Our guards are simply not experienced enough to make in game adjustments on the fly against very experienced big time guards. A halftime adjustment can happen, but even that will be suspect unless it happens to be defensive sets they have had enough time to really get coordinated on in practice.
Yet, even with our serious NCAA inexperience at the guard positions, we could still be dangerous toward the end of the season as our guards get more experience. It might just be at the NIT, but let's not throw in the towel just yet. And if it is the NIT, there is no shame in that given our youth and inexperience. We need to support this squad while they mature, difficult as it is to watch when it looks like the train wreck it does against experienced guards.
Comment