I should have said was questionable to return (in my mind) based on the roster situation and the fact he hit .239 for the year including .174 in conference play. I figured he might be one of those "invited" to find playing time at another school.
That may have changed based on his summer progress. Don't get me wrong, I hope Chase is a Shocker next year, and I have been one of the more vocal ones against the high roster turnover, but when I looked through the roster and looked at building for the future with a fairly young team next year that was one of the names that I thought might not be back in order to get us under the roster limit.
That may have changed based on his summer progress. Don't get me wrong, I hope Chase is a Shocker next year, and I have been one of the more vocal ones against the high roster turnover, but when I looked through the roster and looked at building for the future with a fairly young team next year that was one of the names that I thought might not be back in order to get us under the roster limit.
Comment