Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

HR's Down Nationally 35% First Three Games of Season

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by billybud
    James Madison scored 91 runs and hit 23 homers while sweeping Bucknell this weekend. That sort of production is not typical so that affected the overall numbers a bit.

    That's an amazing number....Bucknell pitching must really serve it up.
    Billybob, I was ready to call BS; however your post is legit. :shock:

    Check link below and click on February 18th... all 4 games scores are shown. Yikes!

    Game 1 = 37-7

    Page Not Found (404): It looks like you're lost... The page you are looking for no longer exists.
    SFL is back!

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by billybud
      James Madison scored 91 runs and hit 23 homers while sweeping Bucknell this weekend. That sort of production is not typical so that affected the overall numbers a bit.

      That's an amazing number....Bucknell pitching must really serve it up.
      James Madison's pitching wasn't very good either. They gave up 34 runs in 4 games themselves.

      Tha park must be a bandbox.

      --'85.
      Basketball Season Tix since '77-78 . . . . . . Baseball Season Tix since '88

      Comment


      • #18
        I'll be very surprised if any Shockers hit 10+ HRs this season. Heck, we'll probably be lucky if anyone hits 7 in our monstrous park.

        Comment


        • #19
          After 60 games this year the Shockers hit 39 home runs. Last year after 60 games the Shockers hit 64 home runs. The bats I guess.
          First a Baseball fan then a Volleyball fan and then I guess I follow the basketball team.

          Comment


          • #20
            There's not much difference between last year and this year besides the HRs, which is probably part of the reason for less run production.
            Code:
            year  avg gp-gs  ab   r   h   2b 3b hr rbi  tb slg%  bb hbp  so gdp  ob% sf sh sb-att  po   a   e fld%
            2010 .296 60-60 2066 441 611 134 17 64 403 971 .470 255  72 428  32 .387 28 23 97-120 1573 640 90 .961
            2011 .284 60-60 2109 380 600 114 16 39 353 863 .409 270  58 417  43 .378 20 34 98-121 1631 666 93 .961
            And here's how our opponents did.
            Code:
            year  avg gp-gs  ab   r   h   2b 3b hr rbi  tb slg%  bb hbp  so gdp  ob% sf sh sb-att  po   a   e fld%
            2010 .277 60-60 2035 312 564  96 14 34 273 790 .388 196  66 438  43 .357 17 38 72-102 1530 574 74 .966
            2011 .251 60-60 2031 263 509  89 10 25 227 693 .341 223  42 456  50 .334 20 55 60-85  1608 633 76 .967
            Pitching the last 2 years.
            Code:
            year  ERA  W-L  APP GS CG SHO/CBO SV  IP    H   R   ER  BB  SO  2B 3B HR  AB  B/Avg WP HBP BK SFA SHA
            2010 4.45 41-19  60 60  7   6/4   12 524.1 564 312 259 196 438  96 14 34 2035  .277 53  66  5  17  38
            2011 3.38 36-24  60 60  7   9/6    9 543.2 509 263 204 223 456  89 10 25 2031  .251 45  42  5  20  55
            And our opponents pitching.
            Code:
            year  ERA  W-L  APP GS CG SHO/CBO SV  IP    H   R   ER  BB  SO  2B 3B HR  AB  B/Avg WP HBP BK SFA SHA
            2010 7.02 19-41  60 60  5   3/3    3 510.0 611 441 398 255 428 134 17 64 2066  .296 68  72  7  28  23
            2011 5.73 24-36  60-60  1   1/1   12 536.0 600 380 341 270 417 114 16 39 2109  .284 41  58  9  20  34

            Comment


            • #21
              Well, they knew when they changed the bats it was going to change the game, and I don't think for the better. It has taken some excitement out of the game (and offense).

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Snapshot9
                Well, they knew when they changed the bats it was going to change the game, and I don't think for the better. It has taken some excitement out of the game (and offense).
                A poll on this topic from fan's around the nation would be interesting.

                Comment

                Working...
                X