Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Big Alienation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Big Alienation

    We are at a remarkable moment. We have an open, 2,000-mile border to our south, and the entity with the power to enforce the law and impose safety and order will not do it. Wall Street collapsed, taking Main Street's money with it, and the government can't really figure out what to do about it because the government itself was deeply implicated in the crash, and both political parties are full of people whose political careers have been made possible by Wall Street contributions. Meanwhile we pass huge laws, bills so comprehensive, omnibus and transformative that no one knows what's in them and no one—literally, no one—knows how exactly they will be executed or interpreted. Citizens search for new laws online, pore over them at night, and come away knowing no more than they did before they typed "dot-gov."

    It is not that no one's in control. Washington is full of people who insist they're in control and who go to great lengths to display their power. It's that no one takes responsibility and authority. Washington daily delivers to the people two stark and utterly conflicting messages: "We control everything" and "You're on your own."

    All this contributes to a deep and growing alienation between the people of America and the government of America in Washington.

    This is not the old, conservative and long-lampooned "I don't trust gummint" attitude of the 1950s, '60s and '70s. It's something new, or rather something so much more broadly and fully evolved that it constitutes something new. The right never trusted the government, but now the middle doesn't. I asked a campaigner for Hillary Clinton recently where her sturdy, pantsuited supporters had gone. They didn't seem part of the Obama brigades. "Some of them are at the tea party," she said.

    ***

    The American president has the power to control America's borders if he wants to, but George W. Bush and Barack Obama did not and do not want to, and for the same reason, and we all know what it is. The fastest-growing demographic in America is the Hispanic vote, and if either party cracks down on illegal immigration, it risks losing that vote for generations.

    But while the Democrats worry about the prospects of the Democrats and the Republicans about the well-being of the Republicans, who worries about America?

    No one. Which the American people have noticed, and which adds to the dangerous alienation—actually it's at the heart of the alienation—of the age.

    In the past four years, I have argued in this space that nothing can or should be done, no new federal law passed, until the border itself is secure. That is the predicate, the commonsense first step. Once existing laws are enforced and the border made peaceful, everyone in the country will be able to breathe easier and consider, without an air of clamor and crisis, what should be done next.

    ***

    Instead, our national establishments deliberately allow the crisis to grow and fester, ignoring public unrest and amusing themselves by damning anyone's attempt to deal with the problem they fear to address.

    Why does the federal government do this? Because so many within it are stupid and unimaginative and don't trust the American people. Which of course the American people have noticed.

    ***

    The American people fear they are losing their place and authority in the daily, unwinding drama of American history. They feel increasingly alienated from their government. And alienation, again, is often followed by deep animosity, and animosity by the breaking up of things. If our leaders were farsighted not only for themselves but for the country, they would fix the border.
    The Big Alienation Uncontrolled borders and Washington's lack of self-control By Peggy Noonan

  • #2
    Interesting point of view. Controlling the border is only the first step (and possibly the easiest) then we need to concentrate on the big problems/government.

    Comment


    • #3
      We wouldn't need such a secure border if:

      1. Free social services were terminated.
      2. Birthright citizenship eliminated.
      3. Marijuana legalized.

      Until then, a secure border and deportation is all that can be done.

      My libertarian-leaning acquaintances are vehemently against the Arizona law, fearing racial profiling and violation of civil rights. But properly enforced, as I understand it, I think it could be somewhat successful.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by RoyalShock
        My libertarian-leaning acquaintances are vehemently against the Arizona law, fearing racial profiling and violation of civil rights. But properly enforced, as I understand it, I think it could be somewhat successful.
        Time will tell. That said I think the opposition’s reaction to the law has been a bit over the top.

        Comment


        • #5
          If only our immigration laws were as strict as Mexicos...
          Infinity Art Glass - Fantastic local artist and Shocker fan
          RIP Guy Always A Shocker
          Carpenter Place - A blessing to many young girls/women
          ICT S.O.S - Great local cause fighting against human trafficking
          Wartick Insurance Agency - Saved me money with more coverage.
          Save Shocker Sports - A rallying cry

          Comment


          • #6
            My evergrowing libertiarian views want the Federal Government to enforce the laws that are on the books.

            I don't give a rats @$$ about who is protesting if they are not legal. If they are not here legally they need to leave the country before they are arrested and get here legally.

            Memo to Obama: "Our constitution does not need to be changed, it needs to be upheld".

            If he took the same oath I did when I entered the military, he needs to change his ways. Part of the oath was to defend the constitution of the United States against all enemies both foreign and domestic. Perhaps he needs to produce records to show whether he is "foreign or domestic".

            To all of you "libs" that this irritates, you will be happy to note that I have spent that past several months raising $$ to help elect as many conservatives as possible. Notice the absence of the word "Republican". If the Republican is not conservative he/she can go to hell along with those who are destroying our republic (Dems/liberals).

            I used to think I could vote for a "blue dog democrat", I am no longer a fool! They have all voted for the liberal fiscal agenda, they no longer exist!

            Comment


            • #7
              If the Republican is not conservative he/she can go to hell along with those who are destroying our republic
              :yes:
              Infinity Art Glass - Fantastic local artist and Shocker fan
              RIP Guy Always A Shocker
              Carpenter Place - A blessing to many young girls/women
              ICT S.O.S - Great local cause fighting against human trafficking
              Wartick Insurance Agency - Saved me money with more coverage.
              Save Shocker Sports - A rallying cry

              Comment


              • #8
                The only thing you can assume when you see an (R) next to a candidates name, is that it stands for (R)uling elite.

                Comment

                Working...
                X