Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama as Greek Tragedy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Obama as Greek Tragedy

    Below are links to a couple of interesting articles by Victor Davis Hanson published earlier this month. I don’t agree with Hanson all the time, but I do respect his opinion a great deal – and I think he is absolutely correct.

    Obama as Greek Tragedy—Part One

    Obama as Greek Tragedy—Part Two

    Interestingly he opines in Part Two:

    Every self-destructive moralist, as tragedy teaches us, is obsessed with the self. In our own age, recall Woodrow Wilson’s shrill furor at lesser mortals who were suspicious of his exalted League of Nations, remember FDR’s court-packing anger at the less than sympathetic Supreme Court, or remember Jimmy Carter’s “crisis of confidence” whine in summer 1979. Such is the lashing out of all exalted moralists when we, the lesser folk, have failed to appreciate the demi-god in the White House who has “deigned” to guide us.

    ***

    What to expect? Obama will call a summit of his security advisors, given that his anti-terrorism sermonizing is now discredited; he will lecture on fiscal responsibility soon, given that he may well match all the debt piled up collectively by all prior presidents; he will talk of bipartisanship, given that he has become the most polarizing figure in recent political history — and very few will listen. His “this is the moment” passed around March 1.

    ***

    ….Democrats are starting to get wise to what Obama has wrought — and many fear not merely that he has the ability to take them down with him, but in fact doesn’t much care about them if he does.

    Oh, Obama may still hover around 50% in the polls for a while, but the problem is that he likes all the things that have brought him disfavor and loathes all the things that might restore his effectiveness.

    If in the past “hope and change” rhetoric bedazzled a college dean or philanthropist, why would he cease now since he believes that both the electorate and the world at large are as gullible to his charms as the university/community-organizing crowd was in the past?

    In short, he can no more stop than could all-knowing Oedipus.
    Unfortunately, I see no signs that would indicate Hanson’s assertions are wrong.

  • #2
    I believe somone's chickens are coming home to roost!

    Comment


    • #3
      Why would Obama change? How could he comprehend that he needs to change?

      In what capacity has he ever faced the real-world, harsh reality that "my beliefs are wrong and that I have to change"?

      Community organizers are always fighting what, in their view, is the good fight. Because it is their view of the world, their position will not change - it cannot change because they are in a holy war to get their way. It never occurs to them that their way is the wrong way. Therefore they may change strategies, but they would never change their mind or their position. It would destroy their very identity.

      Jeremiah Wright cannot change, Bill Ayers cannot change either. The third pea in the pod is Obama because that's how his mentors raised him up.

      Obama will go down swinging stubbornly with his single-minded, ideological community organizer mindest in flames at his side.

      Comment


      • #4
        President Obama’s statement, "I'd rather be a really good one-term president than a mediocre two-term president" dovetails nicely into Hanson’s narrative – he (Obama) never ceases to astonish me.

        What's galling about this statement, to me anyway, is not the false dichotomy (the President has actually stumbled on a real one this time) it is the conceit that it takes to make that statement. Distilled to its essence, President Obama is essentially saying that "I'll be such a good president that the American people won't be smart enough to figure it out until after I'm gone. Sure I risk losing an election, but I'll save the world."

        So which is it that's waiting for you, Mr. President? Rushmore or Olympus?

        Transcript: Diane Sawyer Interviews Obama

        Comment


        • #5
          On the topic of history repeating itself from 93/94 after the Clintons tried to ram healthcare reform down our throats and got blasted on election day:

          The president himself, when that was brought up in one group, said, ‘Well, the big difference here and in ’94 was you’ve got me.’

          Comment

          Working...
          X