Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

White House reveals media control strategy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    ISASO, I really do hate to say it, but of course he is an enemy...he is an enemy of the Constitution. He thinks (as does the President that he helped to elect with misinformation and deceit) that he is smarter than the Constitution and therefore can change or simply ignore what they don't like.

    Those of us that believe in the Constitution are, of course, liars, idiots and right wing whack jobs that spew nothing but lies and misinformation.


    We (right wing whackos) look to entertainment outlets like FoxNews for our information instead of true media outlets that the White House routinely calls on like the non-biased Huffington Post or MSNBC.....2 outlets that obviously have no political agenda at all. Especially the Huffington Post which has for decades been a leader in reporting factual news without any favoritism at all to either political side.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by WuDrWu
      ISASO, I really do hate to say it, but of course he is an enemy...he is an enemy of the Constitution. He thinks (as does the President that he helped to elect with misinformation and deceit) that he is smarter than the Constitution and therefore can change or simply ignore what they don't like.

      Those of us that believe in the Constitution are, of course, liars, idiots and right wing whack jobs that spew nothing but lies and misinformation.


      We (right wing whackos) look to entertainment outlets like FoxNews for our information instead of true media outlets that the White House routinely calls on like the non-biased Huffington Post or MSNBC.....2 outlets that obviously have no political agenda at all. Especially the Huffington Post which has for decades been a leader in reporting factual news without any favoritism at all to either political side.
      Please give examples of Constitution parts that have been changed or ignored. Use reference to exact portion of the constitution. 8)
      I have come here to chew bubblegum and kickass ... and I'm all out of bubblegum.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by ISASO
        What was the final total number of UN resolutions that Hussein (Saddam, not Barack) failed to comply with? 50-something?

        The Leninist Party now in place at the White House did a historically masterful job of fooling the press and therefore, the American public.

        kc, since when does that call for celebration? Unless you're an enemy and then I could see where a celebration is in order.
        So your saying the proper response to the 9-11 attack was to invade a country that had nothing to do with it? Wouldnt Mexico been a lot easier? 8)
        I have come here to chew bubblegum and kickass ... and I'm all out of bubblegum.

        Comment


        • #19
          Answer my question first:

          What was the final total number of UN resolutions that Hussein (Saddam, not Barack) failed to comply with? 50-something?

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by ISASO
            Answer my question first:

            What was the final total number of UN resolutions that Hussein (Saddam, not Barack) failed to comply with? 50-something?
            Whats that got to do with 9-11? How bout Canada? 8)
            I have come here to chew bubblegum and kickass ... and I'm all out of bubblegum.

            Comment


            • #21
              Are we the UN police force?

              Conservatives love to complain about the UN and our membership in it (I'm one of them). But many are quite content to be their military enforcement unit.

              Many railed against Clinton's use of our military under the UN banner, but when it's Bush, it's OK.

              You can't have it both ways.

              Comment

              Working...
              X