And lets be honest, women golfers are just eye candy for the men golfers. Well especially the tennis players. Except for the women's suffrage ones like Billy Jean Whatsername. See we can't remember her name because she wasn't hot.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Idiocracy Protests
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Kung Wu View PostAnd lets be honest, women golfers are just eye candy for the men golfers. Well especially the tennis players. Except for the women's suffrage ones like Billy Jean Whatsername. See we can't remember her name because she wasn't hot.Livin the dream
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kung Wu View PostAnd lets be honest, women golfers are just eye candy for the men golfers. Well especially the tennis players. Except for the women's suffrage ones like Billy Jean Whatsername. See we can't remember her name because she wasn't hot.
Comment
-
Originally posted by seskridgeViolent protestors are ridiculous but it is unamerican to not be okay with peaceful protest.
Originally posted by seskridgeI know this but people in this thread are upset with pretty much all protest and generalizing the 1% of protestors to all of the protestors.
Originally posted by seskridgeconsidering in womans marches which across the united states had millions march and not that Ive heard had any arrest or very few that is less than 1%
Originally posted by seskridgeI'm going to hope this isn't serious........
Comment
-
Originally posted by John Higgins View PostI read last night that the police were told to stand down. If that's the case, it's sadly not an unusual way to handle rioters anymore. A mayor last year, Cleveland or Baltimore maybe?, did a press conference during a riot saying to give them space and let the rioters get their anger out.
Question:
If your property was burned and the mayor gave a stand down order for the police, would you have a case for suing the city for damages? Could they not be viewed as complicit in allowing this to happen?
Turned out the opposite was true. The guy hitting the punching bag anger increased while the guy reading the magazine moved on. It's terrible advise to let someone "get their anger out." It's scientifically counter productive.I just want to stand on land...
@rjl:
If I had a gun with two bullets and was in a room with Hitler, Bin Laden, and a Creighton fan, I think I'd shoot the Creighton fan twice.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wufan View PostThe proper way to engage someone that has ideas that are ridiculous, is to not engage them at all. You can't argue with an idiot.I just want to stand on land...
@rjl:
If I had a gun with two bullets and was in a room with Hitler, Bin Laden, and a Creighton fan, I think I'd shoot the Creighton fan twice.
Comment
-
Originally posted by seskridgeI'm going to hope this isn't serious........
...
This discussion reminds me of something that happened when I was on a business trip flying solo and crossing the Balearic Sea out of Monaco on a cruiseliner.
I was a soccer player and pretty much in my prime so I had some pretty chiseled buttocks at the time. I was wearing some dapper summer khaki pants and just hanging out up front leaning up against the railing taking in the ocean view and listening to the music.
Next thing I know somebody totally pinches my butt! I was like, "whoa what's happening here?" I turned around and I was pretty stunned to see an attractive lady just sort of batting her eyes and smiling at me. She was a bit older than me (I was barely in my 20s, so who wasn't) but clearly her libido was cranking. I'm thinking, "wow! This only happens in dirty magazines!"
So then I'm trying to play it all cool and see where I can take this. There was music playing so I gave her a little American cowboy smile and started to do a slow Axel Rose dance. She started to blush and giggle a little but she was clearly responding.
So I told her, "Hey baby, why don't you turn off that oxygen tank and hop out of that wheelchair and share a little dance with me?"
That's a night I will never forget.Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!
Comment
-
Originally posted by wufan View PostNo I did not. You are mistaken. Peaceful protests are a good thing. That doesn't mean I support all protests or all free speech. Morons shouldn't protest or voice their opinion, but I 100% support their right to do so.
Protesting because you don't think someone should be heard is a protest AGAINST free speech. The protestors that were linked in the article were also NOT peaceful. I stand by my statement and against your made up facts.
I think we're all becoming too cavalier with our use of the phrase "free speech." If a student at Berkeley asks the institution to ban all conservative speakers, that is anti free speech. If the institution hosts a speaker that the student disagrees with, you can protest all you want and it isn't anti free speech. The students are trying to say "I want it to be known that I stand against what this nut job is saying." That's not anti free speech; that is the epitome of free speech.
And I've said several times, I'm sure it's not effective. Liberals should just ignore this guy. You know what satisfies the folks who want to hear him speak? The idea that there are a thousand people outside holding signs chanting about how terrible that speaker is. Milo and the types of college students who support Milo are contrarians that love provoking people. You know the fastest way to get a 4 year old to stop saying "I'm not touching you..."? Just stop reacting. A bad strategy doesn't make you anti free speech, though.
Comment
-
Originally posted by seskridgeI'm going to hope this isn't serious........Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!
Comment
Comment