2016 Presidential Debate #3

[RoyalShock]

I found video of tonight's debate:

[RoyalShock]

Hillary: "I will not add a penny to the debt."

Note to self: Remember this for the next 8 years.

That's candidate-eze for "I won't add a penny to the current rate of increase, ie. the deficit". Remember their definition of spending cuts?

[tropicalshox]

A pretty fair debate. Good job by the moderator.

[pinstripers]

Don't like him much. Hate her.

[shockmonster]

Don't like him much. Hate her.

Right. He's bad. She's worse.

Your new President will be The Clintons again.

[Aargh]

Bill Clionton left the office with world peace, a budget surplus, and the ultimate stinky cigar. I doubt Hillary will do as well.

I thought Trump gained some ground tonight, but he had to gain something like a continent. Or at least a large island - maybe something like Greenland.

[Jamar Howard 4 President]

Trump wants constitution interpeted the way the founders intended.
Reiterated he will appoint 2nd Amendment and pro-life justices.

Boom.

Breaking: Trump says words his listeners want to hear. Continues con job. Makes money. Screws over everyone else.

[Jamar Howard 4 President]

Trump would literally be more likely to appoint Hillary Clinton herself to the Supreme Court, as a jab at Paul Ryan, Ted Cruz, etc., than he would be to appoint a Scalia type judge out of concern for constitutional integrity.

(I'm not totally dismissive that Trump *might* appoint a good justice. I'm just 100% dismissive that it would be for any reason other than he found it beneficial to his pocket book.)

[WstateU]

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/video/chris-wallace-dad-monishes-trump-clinton-audience-again-and-again/vi-AAjauxh?ocid=spartandhp

[ShockingButTrue]

Trump would literally be more likely to appoint Hillary Clinton herself to the Supreme Court, as a jab at Paul Ryan, Ted Cruz, etc., than he would be to appoint a Scalia type judge out of concern for constitutional integrity.

(I'm not totally dismissive that Trump *might* appoint a good justice. I'm just 100% dismissive that it would be for any reason other than he found it beneficial to his pocket book.)

I'll give you a little bit of credit for your asinine statement because you might really believe that.

But if you haven't seen his list of nominees for the Supreme Court, yet opine hastily, you've just revealed (again) your supercilious ignorance.

I would recommend you do some research on your Johari Window, because you'd get more out of it than you would researching Supreme Court nominees. You might become likable.

[Jamar Howard 4 President]

I'll give you a little bit of credit for your asinine statement because you might really believe that.

But if you haven't seen his list of nominees for the Supreme Court, yet opine hastily, you've just revealed (again) your supercilious ignorance.

I would recommend you do some research on your Johari Window, because you'd get more out of it than you would researching Supreme Court nominees. You might become likable.

lol. I've seen the list. I'm just not dumb enough to believe it was generated by Trump's personal concern for the Constitution.

Have you not been paying attention to Trump's sabotaging of Republicans in Congress who are up for re-election? This whole run for President is about him and what he can get out of it. He'd happily throw any Republican under the bus and give Dems more power if he found a way to benefit personally from the exchange. The only pragmatic argument for Trump is that his personal interests are sometimes in line with conservative interests, and therefore his selfishness will still lead to some conservative results.

[Kung Wu]

Breaking: Trump says words his listeners want to hear. Continues con job. Makes money. Screws over everyone else.

Disagree.

[1972Shocker]

Best Focus Group of this election cycle:

https://youtu.be/69raxoyhHZU