-
-
I want to see a change at the top as much as you do, but to be fair, they all are good at giving away our money, Democrats and Republicans.Originally posted by WuDrWu View PostAn “Old West” Texas analysis and summary of Mueller report and Congress’ efforts in one sentence:
"While we recognize that the subject did not actually steal any horses, he is obviously guilty of trying to resist being hanged for it." -
-
Both excellent points.Comment
-
There has to be some method of running this country than what has been going on for a number of years. Even before Obama, we were having our problems. But, he has certainly carried them to a totally different level.
There has to be some controls on spending, on printing money, on making loans to international countries and banks with virtually no limits, accountbility, no congrssional review, and virtually no financial constraints.Comment
-
This makes for a nice bumper sticker, but a pretty absurd prism through which to view the world.
Why do this to yourself?I think Pringles original intention was to make tennis balls... but on the day the rubber was supposed to show up a truckload of potatoes came. Pringles is a laid-back company, so they just said, "**** it, cut em up!" - MHComment
-
huh?Comment
-
The point of the article is to claim that Obama is greedy (more greedy than Romney, at least).
The point of this thread is to say that Obama is a hypocrite.
The evidence (percentage of total income given to charity, as reported on tax returns) doesn't really support either claim.
a) It's absurd to compare what someone who 'earned' 300k/year with someone who 'earned' 20mil/year. Would there be any point in comparing family spending patterns between a household earning 25k/year and one earning 300k/year? No.
b) Reported charitable giving as a percentage of taxable income is an unbelievably poor single marker of 'greed'.
c) I'm pretty sure that Romney gave quite a bit of his money to a cult. ;-)
Good bumper sticker propaganda. Bad thinking.
Can I get an amen?I think Pringles original intention was to make tennis balls... but on the day the rubber was supposed to show up a truckload of potatoes came. Pringles is a laid-back company, so they just said, "**** it, cut em up!" - MHComment
-
Probably not. I know plenty of people who give alot more money to charity than Obama and they don't make close to $300,000/year.Originally posted by Wu du Nord View PostComment
-
Good, but irrelevant.Originally posted by SB Shock View Post
Do you know plenty of people who have Nobel Peace Prizes? Equally relevant.I think Pringles original intention was to make tennis balls... but on the day the rubber was supposed to show up a truckload of potatoes came. Pringles is a laid-back company, so they just said, "**** it, cut em up!" - MHComment
-
Amen? No, certainly not.Comment
-
Fixed that for ya. ;-)Originally posted by pinstripers View Post
Don't fret too much, though. I'm sure super scary greedy hypocrite black communist nazi muslim alien man will do something evil tomorrow. Then it'll be your turn to be right. I'll even let you wear the hat.I think Pringles original intention was to make tennis balls... but on the day the rubber was supposed to show up a truckload of potatoes came. Pringles is a laid-back company, so they just said, "**** it, cut em up!" - MHComment
-
He's not a nazi.Comment
-
I laughed. ;-)Originally posted by pinstripers View PostI think Pringles original intention was to make tennis balls... but on the day the rubber was supposed to show up a truckload of potatoes came. Pringles is a laid-back company, so they just said, "**** it, cut em up!" - MHComment
-
Of course it relevant - for at least me. I have context to understand Obama is a cheap bastage.Originally posted by Wu du Nord View PostComment
Tweet
Comment