Originally posted by ShockingButTrue
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Presidential Election: Get out and vote!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by pinstripers View PostI can't decide whether to vote for the pedophile who sold out the USA for cash, or vote for the guy who says mean things..............
- Likes 1
Comment
-
The truth is, all people are racist to some degree as are animals. It is an evolved survival mechanism to stay within your own kind. It makes it less likely to be singled out by...whom/whatever.
That being said, we are higher lifeforms with greatly evolved brains, so we can make choices that go against our primal instincts. But there are those in society who are less evolved than others to say the least.
I wonder what society would be like with a mixture of homogenous black, Asian, white, and Hispanic companies. Of course you could apply at a black company if you were white or a white company if you were black, but there would be no obligation either way.
Businesses essential for corporate functioning like banking, legal, and accounting would have to be non-discriminatory so there's an even playing field. There would also have to be slightly relaxed standards for minority businesses to obtain financing as the white-only companies would have a significant liquidity advantage. Ideally you would have all sorts of companies, some homogenous, some not, but everybody would be happy in their own little bubble.
This probably wouldn't work for some reason or the other, but if it could ever get up to the point where there's solid competition without subsidy, I think it could be even more innovative than our markets now. Competition would be for racial pride as well as profits. Think of it like college basketball; 350 teams all with different backgrounds, goals, and dreams.
So forcing people to integrate into one corpus may be a mistake. Instead, subsidize minority businesses to some degree so that all races can have "ownership" in their own means of production.
Man... what I just said was racist..... or maybe it was liberal? Or maybe the highest form of freedom?
Comment
-
Originally posted by pinstripers View PostI can't decide whether to vote for the pedophile who sold out the USA for cash, or vote for the guy who says mean things..............Deuces Valley.
... No really, deuces.
________________
"Enjoy the ride."
- a smart man
Comment
-
Originally posted by revenge_of_shocka_khan View Post
A body leotard doesn't work well on her. Call me what ever you want, but when you have that much overhang, it's downright ugly. Luckily she has a pretty good sized beer gut which hides her camel toe.There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.
Comment
-
Originally posted by C0|dB|00ded View PostThe truth is, all people are racist to some degree as are animals. It is an evolved survival mechanism to stay within your own kind. It makes it less likely to be singled out by...whom/whatever.
That being said, we are higher lifeforms with greatly evolved brains, so we can make choices that go against our primal instincts. But there are those in society who are less evolved than others to say the least.
I wonder what society would be like with a mixture of homogenous black, Asian, white, and Hispanic companies. Of course you could apply at a black company if you were white or a white company if you were black, but there would be no obligation either way.
Businesses essential for corporate functioning like banking, legal, and accounting would have to be non-discriminatory so there's an even playing field. There would also have to be slightly relaxed standards for minority businesses to obtain financing as the white-only companies would have a significant liquidity advantage. Ideally you would have all sorts of companies, some homogenous, some not, but everybody would be happy in their own little bubble.
This probably wouldn't work for some reason or the other, but if it could ever get up to the point where there's solid competition without subsidy, I think it could be even more innovative than our markets now. Competition would be for racial pride as well as profits. Think of it like college basketball; 350 teams all with different backgrounds, goals, and dreams.
So forcing people to integrate into one corpus may be a mistake. Instead, subsidize minority businesses to some degree so that all races can have "ownership" in their own means of production.
Man... what I just said was racist..... or maybe it was liberal? Or maybe the highest form of freedom?
Livin the dream
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Man, I swear you couldn't make this stuff up!! Lead analyst Jeff Toobin on CNN caught jerkin it on a Zoom call with his colleagues. He was most likely lookin at pics of Hiden Joe while "working".
New details are emerging about what exactly led to the suspension of New Yorker staff writer Jeffrey Toobin.
The call, which was described as an "election simulation," featured Toobin's New Yorker colleagues including Jane Mayer, Masha Gessen, Andrew Marantz, Jelani Cobb, Evan Osnos, Sue Halpern, and Dexter Filkins playing various roles in potential 2020 outcomes including President Trump, Joe Biden, "establishment Republicans," 'establishment Democrats," and "the military." Toobin was playing "the courts."
According to two sources, Toobin was seen masturbating in what was supposed to be a 10-minute "strategy session" along party lines, but that it "seemed like Toobin was on a second video call."
"The sources said that when the groups returned from their breakout rooms, Toobin lowered the camera. The people on the call said they could see Toobin touching his penis. Toobin then left the call. Moments later, he called back in, seemingly unaware of what his colleagues had been able to see, and the simulation continued," Vice reported.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by MoValley John View Post
Comment
-
@brad_polumbo
·
Stanford study says that Biden's tax & regulatory agenda would: — Kill 5 million jobs — Shrink the economy by $2.6 trillion — Decrease consumption by $1.5 trillion — Reduce median household income by $6,500Last edited by pinstripers; October 19, 2020, 08:35 PM.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by MikeKennedyRulZ View PostMan, I swear you couldn't make this stuff up!! Lead analyst Jeff Toobin on CNN caught jerkin it on a Zoom call with his colleagues. He was most likely lookin at pics of Hiden Joe while "working".
New details are emerging about what exactly led to the suspension of New Yorker staff writer Jeffrey Toobin.
On a side note, it is ironic that his name is Toobin...Livin the dream
Comment
Comment