Tweet
Not really in Time Warner's benefit to be impartial.
-
Not really in Time Warner's benefit to be impartial.There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese. -
Not in Disney's best interest to be impartial, either.There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.Comment
-
Comcast (NBC) actually broke a little to the right, but not much.There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.Comment
-
CBS throws their money hard left.There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.Comment
-
No media bias here.....There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.Comment
-
MSNBC is fair and balanced? What makes you think that the reporting is not driven by money? They have to pay for their salaries.Originally posted by MoValley John View PostComment
-
The reporting is driven by ideology. The news being dumbed down and sensationalized to almost being Jerry Springer like, is driven by ratings.Originally posted by engrshock View Post
The news media isn't trying to manipulate a close election for the sake of ratings, if that were the case, what would the news media do for ratings the next three years? They are in the tank, totally for Hillary, it's their ideology; they sensationalize for ratings.
The mainstream media is incredibly biased, they should be embarrassed. Not just Fox, all of them. Fox is the only outlet not in the tank for Hillary. Look at where they all donate their money. It's ridiculous.There are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.Comment
-
There is a potential for 1 1/2 to 2 billion dollars available to be spent just for the presidential election. If there is a blowout one way or the other no one has to spend much money. It is in the best interest of getting money to have a close election. It is always about the money. Fox was smart and identified a portion of the population that was not being "served" the right news that was wanted. They grew to be a major player. IF there was no money in that position they would not have done that regardless of their ideology. I suppose the same can be said for MSNBC, CNN etc. MSN seems to have a different audience than MSNBC yet they are related.Comment
-
The headline hit me with a red flag. BTW, I see red flags on both sides of political issues.Originally posted by Kung Wu View Post
Here's the headline:
If this were just reporting, the word "positive" would not be in that headline. The headline is worded in a manner to direct the readers thinking.“Shut it Down!”: Reuters Orders Cameraman to Kill Positive Trump Footage
I hadn't watched the video, so I went back to see what was going on. The site has been updated with the following:
Sound bites, phrases taken out of context, and reporting only the parts that fit a narrative are commonplace in mainstream and sidestream media. It's sage advice to consider the source. You are typically going to get one side of the story or one version of the story. With that in mind, it's possible to check multiple sources and come to a somewhat informed conclusion that may not agree with anything reported by any single media source.The Detroit Trump footage being circulated on Twitter and elsewhere was not filmed by Reuters. Reuters obtained the footage from third-party providers and the voices heard on the video are not Reuters staff or contractors.
It's way too easy to let someone else do your thinking for you.The future's so bright - I gotta wear shades.
We like to cut down nets and get sized for championship rings.Comment
-
\Originally posted by engrshock View Post
Show me a "hard news" guy at MSNBC. The only one close is Brian Williams. They often even have "opinion" people like Chris Matthews, etc. handling their election coverage. There are several "hard news" guys at Fox like Chris Wallace, Megyn Kelly, Brett Baier, or Shepherd Smith that man their election coverage. You don't see a Hannity, etc.Comment
-
Originally posted by Aargh View Post
It has nothing to do with that. A incorrect source was attributed and then redacted. Regardless, the source was biased whether it was Reuters or not.Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!Comment
-
In all seriousness, I hope you guys don't rely on Alex Jones as a credible news source - whether through his website, radio show, or otherwise, the man is a hate machine and has a well-earned label as a fringe right conspiracy theoristComment
-
Whom are you referring to when you you say, "you guys?"Originally posted by Play Angry View PostThere are three rules that I live by: never get less than twelve hours sleep; never play cards with a guy who has the same first name as a city; and never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Now you stick to that, and everything else is cream cheese.Comment
-
Posters on this forum.Comment
-
Nobody does. He had the video.Originally posted by Play Angry View PostKung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!Comment
Comment