Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Does Feingold want feds to control ALL surface waters?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Does Feingold want feds to control ALL surface waters?



    It amends the Federal Water Pollution Control act, redefining "Waters of the United States" to be pretty much anything that might hold or carry water that would cross state lines or ends up in a sea or ocean. At least that is the way I read it. It already has 24 Senate co-sponsors.

    `(25) WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES- The term `waters of the United States' means all waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide, the territorial seas, and all interstate and intrastate waters and their tributaries, including lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, natural ponds, and all impoundments of the foregoing, to the fullest extent that these waters, or activities affecting these waters, are subject to the legislative power of Congress under the Constitution.'.

  • #2
    This is getting ridiculous
    Infinity Art Glass - Fantastic local artist and Shocker fan
    RIP Guy Always A Shocker
    Carpenter Place - A blessing to many young girls/women
    ICT S.O.S - Great local cause fighting against human trafficking
    Wartick Insurance Agency - Saved me money with more coverage.
    Save Shocker Sports - A rallying cry

    Comment

    Working...
    X