Obama campaign cuts off WFTV after interview with Joe Biden

[SB Shock]

West wondered about Sen. Barack Obama's comment, to Joe the Plumber, about spreading the wealth. She quoted Karl Marx and asked how Obama isn't being a Marxist with the "spreading the wealth" comment.

"Are you joking?" said Biden, who is Obama's running mate. "No," West said.

West later asked Biden about his comments that Obama could be tested early on as president. She wondered if the Delaware senator was saying America's days as the world's leading power were over.

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2008/10/obama-campaign.html

Interview has been pulled from their site.

[Hotel Paper]

so people are getting their stories from blogs? are you guys that bored? we have shocker madness tonight to worry about

[double dribble]

It was a simple question, just tell the people how income re-distribution is not the same as Marxism. the fact that Biden wouldn't/couldn't answer the question is very telling.

[kcshocker11]

It was a simple question, just tell the people how income re-distribution is not the same as Marxism. the fact that Biden wouldn't/couldn't answer the question is very telling.

Your DD why would he waste his time answering such ridiculus question! 8)

[RoyalShock]

It was a simple question, just tell the people how income re-distribution is not the same as Marxism. the fact that Biden wouldn't/couldn't answer the question is very telling.

I agree. The problem is, too many Americans simply don't care anymore.

[wu_shizzle]

why would he waste his time answering such ridiculus (sp) question! 8)

Joe Biden = kcshocker11

Drive by posting and bold claims that don't stand up to scrutiny - check.

When presented with facts, obfuscate and claim the question is ridiculous - check.

[kcshocker11]

why would he waste his time answering such ridiculus (sp) question! 8)

Joe Biden = kcshocker11

Drive by posting and bold claims that don't stand up to scrutiny - check.

When presented with facts, obfuscate and claim the question is ridiculous - check.

Just the facts maam!

Did you want him to expain this!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_tax#Arguments_for_implementation

origin of modern progressive taxation to Adam Smith, who wrote in The Wealth of Nations:

The necessaries of life occasion the great expense of the poor. They find it difficult to get food, and the greater part of their little revenue is spent in getting it. The luxuries and vanities of life occasion the principal expense of the rich, and a magnificent house embellishes and sets off to the best advantage all the other luxuries and vanities which they possess. A tax upon house-rents, therefore, would in general fall heaviest upon the rich; and in this sort of inequality there would not, perhaps, be anything very unreasonable. It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.[16]

In most western European countries and the United States, advocates of progressive taxation tend to be found among the majority of economists and social scientists who realize that completely proportional taxation is not even a possibility.[17][18] In the U.S., the vast majority of economists (81%) support progressive taxation.[17][18]

Or did you want him to expose Adam Smith for the commie he was?

Communism abducates a classless society, raising tax rates is not communisn since no class is eliminated or even attempted to be eliminated! Its a long standing part of our tax laws.

8)

[wu_shizzle]

2001 Chicago Public Radio Interview with Obama discussing the best way to bring about a Redistribution of Wealth

4 minutes of Obama talking income redistribution without the filters of campaign advisers.

[shocrates]

"I'm not interested in the suburbs. The suburbs bore me."

[Maggie]

2001 Chicago Public Radio Interview with Obama discussing the best way to bring about a Redistribution of Wealth

4 minutes of Obama talking income redistribution without the filters of campaign advisers.

This is interesting....any comments?

[WuDrWu]

I'll comment.


If this get the "legs" that Sarah's "expenses" on her clothes got from the mainstream media, then the race is suddenly up for grabs and Obama will be in real trouble.

I suspect, however, that you aren't going to hear anything but a blurb and it will be all but dismissed.

The new TeflonDon.

[Maggie]

I'll comment.


If this get the "legs" that Sarah's "expenses" on her clothes got from the mainstream media, then the race is suddenly up for grabs and Obama will be in real trouble.

I suspect, however, that you aren't going to hear anything but a blurb and it will be all but dismissed.

The new TeflonDon.

I want to hear what those that defend Obama think of this declaration....

[shocrates]

Here is the last Democratic president with NADS:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7YkJxQT_0Y

[Maggie]

2001 Chicago Public Radio Interview with Obama discussing the best way to bring about a Redistribution of Wealth

4 minutes of Obama talking income redistribution without the filters of campaign advisers.

Hello......is this what you think....I hear nothing.....what is your problem?

[shocrates]

Questions allowed by the Obama/Biden campaign:

1. How did you get so wonderful?
2. How did you get so smart?
3. Can you really turn water into wine?
4. How does it feel to be the greatest candidates ever?

My understanding is Jumpin Joe just banned a Philadelphia station as well.