Hmmmm....

[t7017s]

http://www.washtimes.com/news/2008/oct/12/obamas-kenya-ghosts/

And this is a very thorough piece...

http://ajacksonian.blogspot.com/2008/01/odinga-obama-and-lack-of-courage.html

And for those that don't like to read...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8QcpdUtxNQ

[shocrates]

Good Luck, T. I posted basically the same thing last week and it was dismissed as fiction.

[t7017s]

Newest updates on the situation...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7671080.stm

[t7017s]

I can't believe that nobody has anything to say in regards to these links. Nothing from either side of the fence. Is this "untouchable"? To severe to illicit a response from anyone in any regard? Anyone think this is BS? Anyone totally disturbed by this? Anything at all from anyone?!?!? Bueller.... Bueller... Bueller...

[rrshock]

COMMENTARY:

That's all that needs to be said about the Washington Post thing.

[RoyalShock]

t, for me it's a matter of "it doesn't surprise me in the least." Anyone who's been paying attention can see Obama's socialist/Marxist leanings and stories like this only confirm it more. As bad as I hate to say it, and it's been said many times before, America will get the president it deserves.

"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the Public Treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from the Public Treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy always followed by dictatorship." - Sir Alex Fraser Tytler (1742-1813)

The above quote is why a "progressive" platform will amost assuredly lead us away from a democratic form of government. You can't be "progressive" without convincing people it's a good thing to redistribute the wealth collected through taxes to "ourselves" and others the "progressives" deem worthy.

Sorry for going a little off-topic there.

[RoyalShock]

COMMENTARY:

That's all that needs to be said about the Washington Post thing.

So, because it says "Commentary" at the top, you dismiss the factual information in the article?

[rrshock]

COMMENTARY:

That's all that needs to be said about the Washington Post thing.

So, because it says "Commentary" at the top, you dismiss the factual information in the article?

Not necessarily, but I dismiss how it is presented whether it is left or right leaning. Facts can be misconstrued to make them appear to show one thing when it is really quite the opposite. I think many on here are always blaming the media of this. So I have just decided to mostly blow off everything that I hear from now till the election, because things are only going to get nastier, dirtier, and just down right unbearable as both candidates start the home stretch and try to go for the juggular.

It's not just the presidential election, but most of the ones that you are seeing or hearing ads for.