Johnny football

[shocka khan]

Without wealth CREATION we will be doomed. Can government create wealth? NO, it can't, it
can only redistribute it but it does not create it. So, if creating wealth is the only solution to our
debt problem then we had better start funneling it back into private enterprises that hire
workers that PRODUCE/ CREATE wealth and NOT government which only drives up the debt.

Your response is a little simplistic, as it assumes that if we funnel it back to private enterprises who will invest in America and American workers. Unfortunately, that is not always the case nowadays. MANY large multi-national companies have outsourced operations to the Phillipines, Central America, China and India. If the money gets transferred back to those countries to create jobs and increase wages, it will not be American jobs created or American wages increased.

Even though I agree with your argument on the surface, today's interconnected economy does not guarantee a satisfactory outcome for American workers or American wages.

[MoValley John]

The glass is like your brain, totally empty. Bh the way, which juco did you get your nursing degree from? I ask that because if brains were dynamite, you wouldn't have enough to blow your nose. You and the RWNJ's 'I ****ed your mom' gag is more fit for a mentally challenged ex-high school jock. It reflects on your lack of intellect and upbringing.

And no, it has no impact on me nor on my mother's skeletal remains.

Dude, see? See what you did? The dead mom card doesn't work. Lots of us have dead moms, all of us that don't right this minute, will. If you are going to counter either the mom our wife card, and I don't recommend it, is the "My mom's in a coma" card. See the old Seinfeld episode. Dead moms don't work, mom's in a coma, does.

[MoValley John]

Shocka, here is the one and only defense to the "I slept with your mom/wife" card. Hope this helps.

https://youtu.be/oApBlWipc2A

[SHOXAAC]

Shocka, here is the one and only defense to the "I slept with your mom/wife" card. Hope this helps.

https://youtu.be/oApBlWipc2A

"His wife is in a coma." I love it.

[Kung Wu]

MANY large multi-national companies have outsourced operations to the Phillipines, Central America, China and India.

Why would they do that?

[Kung Wu]

Shocka, here is the one and only defense to the "I slept with your mom/wife" card. Hope this helps.

https://youtu.be/oApBlWipc2A

Well after the "coma" comeback there is the "See!? I screwed her so hard she's in a coma" gambit.

[wusphlash]

From this mornings Opinion Line. Pretty funny.

While many think that quarterback Johnny Manziel has hit rock bottom in his personal and professional life, I do not think he is quite there yet. He will not have hit rock bottom until he starts dating a Kardashian.

[ShockBand]

From this mornings Opinion Line. Pretty funny.

While many think that quarterback Johnny Manziel has hit rock bottom in his personal and professional life, I do not think he is quite there yet. He will not have hit rock bottom until he starts dating a Kardashian.

Does Caitlyn Jenner count as a Kardashian in that respect?

[shocka khan]

Why would they do that?

Here's the background. Large multinational corporations have outsourced business functions (i.e. jobs) , which increases their profits in those countries, but 'strands' the profits as they can't be brought back into American operations without triggering a tax penalty.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-06-09/repatriation-tax-holiday-would-cost-u-s-95-8-billion

In 2004, our congress passed a holiday to allow these corporations to bring them in by declaring a tax holiday. The rationale was that it would spur investment and create American jobs. It did not. Here is an analysis performed by the Heritage institute:

http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2011/10/would-another-repatriation-tax-holiday-create-jobs

They advocate for a tax holiday that allows repatriation of the 'stranded' profits, but only if the enabling legislation requires the investment be made in the United States. It sure looks like Heritage agrees at least some level, that the tax breaks, if reinvested, were not invested in the United States, Other people who performed studies of the impact of the 2004 legislation concluded that the tax holiday actually accelerated outsourcing (because the investment was made outside the United States) and accelerated the loss of American jobs.

[Kung Wu]

Here's the background.

You didn't answer my question. You sort of went off on a tangent.

Large multinational corporations have outsourced business functions (i.e. jobs) ...

Unless you are 100% interested in returning the 8.5 million jobs outsourced to ILLEGAL immigrants right here in the good old USA, I don't think you have a leg to stand on bitching about the 2.4 million jobs LEGALLY outsourced to foreign workers by corporations. The very liberals bitching about corporations hiring foreigners are the same people advocating a practice that is doing 3.5x the damage. But it's actually MUCH WORSE than 3.5x. You see, the corporations aren't outsourcing jobs at an exponential growth rate. But the 11+ million illegal alien population? It's growing exponentially, just like all fat and happy populations do.

[DUShock]

[MoValley John]

Goose died.............


But not before he nailed your mom.

[shocka khan]

You didn't answer my question. You sort of went off on a tangent.



Unless you are 100% interested in returning the 8.5 million jobs outsourced to ILLEGAL immigrants right here in the good old USA, I don't think you have a leg to stand on bitching about the 2.4 million jobs LEGALLY outsourced to foreign workers by corporations. The very liberals bitching about corporations hiring foreigners are the same people advocating a practice that is doing 3.5x the damage. But it's actually MUCH WORSE than 3.5x. You see, the corporations aren't outsourcing jobs at an exponential growth rate. But the 11+ million illegal alien population? It's growing exponentially, just like all fat and happy populations do.

Why did they do that? Please explain. You're going off on a tangent.

[MoValley John]

Why did they do that? Please explain. You're going off on a tangent.

No, he didn't go off on a tangent. Depending on what political party you support, you either accept, or you complain about illegal immigrants. Also, depending on what political party you support, you either accept or complain about outsourcing jobs. It's the same thing. Well, actually, it's not. Illegal immigration accounts for far more jobs lost than outsourcing, and with illegal immigration, we are also strapped with the social costs. Illegal immigrants keep some money here, but more than 60% of the income is sent back home. That is why you find so many Western Union locations in Mexican and Latin American communities.

Me, I just understand that all the bitching is nothing more than political posturing and live with both.

And I nailed your mom.

[MoValley John]

http://fusion.net/story/4051/mexican-immigrants-arent-sending-as-much-money-home/

Here, the money is less than before the recession, but $22 billion? Back to Mexico? You don't have a problem with that, yet you birch about job outsourcing?