Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fantasy Football Anyone?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    How exactly does this playoff format we are using work? I see that 4 teams go to the playoffs. Do the top two teams from each division go? Will it take the best four records regardless of division? If the commish could clarify it, I would be appreciative of that.
    78-65

    Comment


    • #62
      I'm not sure in this league, but in all the leagues I've played in, it is top two in each division regardless of scores or records of the other division are concerned.
      "You Don't Have to Play a Perfect Game. Your Best is Good Enough."

      Comment


      • #63
        Regarding Playoffs - the top team from each division (based on W-L record) qualifies for the final four and the next two best records overall. So . . . it's very possible we could have three teams from one division and the top team from the other one. After W-L records, the tiebreaker is points scored.

        Comment


        • #64
          Winner of SNFL 2015 will receive this program from the 35-1 season autographed by 3G, Cle, Nick, CJ and Kadeem along with bragging rights for the year - both of which are pretty much priceless.

          Attached Files

          Comment


          • #65
            I just got a notification that someone traded away Aaron Rodgers for Martavius. I didn't look to see who it was, but whoever it was must have one hell of a starting qb to make that deal.
            "You Don't Have to Play a Perfect Game. Your Best is Good Enough."

            Comment


            • #66
              Yeah I have Brady. I need a WR or RB, and Bryant would be perfect. It got vetoed by Triticum. I guess trading the 4th ranked QB who is doing nothing on my bench for a suspended elite receiver is illegal.
              People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. -Isaac Asimov

              Originally posted by C0|dB|00ded
              Who else posts fake **** all day in order to maintain the acrimony? Wingnuts, that's who.

              Comment


              • #67
                Anyone do Fanduel? Its pretty fun and addicting stuff.
                Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/Shox_KCfan

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by shock View Post
                  Yeah I have Brady. I need a WR or RB, and Bryant would be perfect. It got vetoed by Triticum. I guess trading the 4th ranked QB who is doing nothing on my bench for a suspended elite receiver is illegal.
                  My quarterbacks are pathetic in the SNFL league. I'd love to have Aaron Rogers. See if there's anyone on my squad that makes sense in a trade. Maybe Calvin Johnson?
                  "You Don't Have to Play a Perfect Game. Your Best is Good Enough."

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by shock View Post
                    Yeah I have Brady. I need a WR or RB, and Bryant would be perfect. It got vetoed by Triticum. I guess trading the 4th ranked QB who is doing nothing on my bench for a suspended elite receiver is illegal.
                    You can always resubmit Rodgers for Kelce again. You'll have to excuse me, I don't check my email on a daily basis and it is not uncommon for me to go a few days before I check it so that is why I missed the original proposal. I'd love to entertain the proposal again.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by shock View Post
                      Yeah I have Brady. I need a WR or RB, and Bryant would be perfect. It got vetoed by Triticum. I guess trading the 4th ranked QB who is doing nothing on my bench for a suspended elite receiver is illegal.
                      I guess I'd sure like to know why our trade got vetoed @Triticum aestivum L.:

                      It says our trade was vetoed by the League Manager. What torks me off most is now if we re-submit it, I won't have Rodgers for this week, which was one of the huge reasons the trade makes sense still at this time.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        I guess I'd sure like to know why our trade got vetoed @Triticum aestivum L.

                        It says our trade was vetoed by the League Manager. What torks me off most is now if we re-submit it, I won't have Rodgers for this week, which was one of the huge reasons the trade makes sense still at this time.
                        Guys I'm not trying to be heavy handed on this, but everyone has to admit this is not remotely close to an equitable trade. Rodgers, the #1 scorer last year for the #42 at his position - a guy who still has to sit out 2 more games? I know for a fact that there were much better, multiple player offers out there for Rodgers.

                        @sdshox:, I believe I can expedite a trade if a new one (or the same one) is proposed and there are no objections from the rest of the group.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          I have to agree. We had a husband and wife in one of my leagues last year, and no veto power. I think it was AJ Green that had been suspended and was just becoming eligible and Calvin Johnson that she traded to him for a couple of absolute no names. It reaked. I am by no means insinuating that this situation is similar to that one, but it was the first thought that crossed my mind when I saw the trade that had been agreed to.
                          "You Don't Have to Play a Perfect Game. Your Best is Good Enough."

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Who gives a flip why I want to do it? I have my reasons. It would be different if Rogers was ever my starter, but I would only play him on Pats bye week. #12 is a shitty ass draft position, so sue me if I drafted trade bait. I need points at RB, WR, or Flex. Sorry, but Calvin sucks balls this year. I combed all the rosters, and I only had one approached trade. KC can tell you I tried like hell to get Kelce. I would take that trade again, but I already made a deal with sdshock. And that one trade approach? Triticum offered me a bunch of shitty WRs and Rivers. Hardly anything that I am looking for. If anything stinks in this deal, it's that.

                            EDITED to elaborate.

                            Originally posted by Triticum aestivum L. View Post
                            Guys I'm not trying to be heavy handed on this, but everyone has to admit this is not remotely close to an equitable trade. Rodgers, the #1 scorer last year for the #42 at his position - a guy who still has to sit out 2 more games? I know for a fact that there were much better, multiple player offers out there for Rodgers.
                            Just your proposed trade, buddy.

                            Maclin has scored a grand total of five points each game, Doug Martin was 5 and 7, Markus Wheaton was 7 and 6, and Rivers has scored 20 and 13. NONE are starting material on my team, and half are on Triticums bench. Its obvious he is just butt hurt that I wanted someone that would put points up, not eventually get cut.
                            Attached Files
                            Last edited by shock; September 25, 2015, 05:17 PM.
                            People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. -Isaac Asimov

                            Originally posted by C0|dB|00ded
                            Who else posts fake **** all day in order to maintain the acrimony? Wingnuts, that's who.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Just my 2 cents, but if the commissioner is actively involved in a trade for X player, then I think the commissioner should absolve himself from the ability to veto on that player if another trade is put through for X player. Make it a vote by majority to deny it, or even 1/3 the league to veto.
                              ShockerHoops.net - A Wichita State Basketball Blog

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by _kai_ View Post
                                Just my 2 cents, but if the commissioner is actively involved in a trade for X player, then I think the commissioner should absolve himself from the ability to veto on that player if another trade is put through for X player. Make it a vote by majority to deny it, or even 1/3 the league to veto.
                                League rules say it takes 4 vetoes to cancel a trade.
                                People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. -Isaac Asimov

                                Originally posted by C0|dB|00ded
                                Who else posts fake **** all day in order to maintain the acrimony? Wingnuts, that's who.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X