If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
A great example of why people hate lawyers. Every judge is certain he or she is a lot smarter than the one before so they interpret law with all of their new found intelligence. And even if it was bad law, those bad laws were originally written by lawyers.
So now they go back and give these 2 wastes of skin another day in court where they have no chance of winning because they did do it. Nobody should have to go through that hell again.
We can discuss the costs and merits of the death penalty, and there are fair arguments on both sides, but if it were ever to be applied, this is the case to apply it. If lawyers aren't going to uphold that here, then there isn't much reason to ever try it again.
These two loser brothers worked in concert together during this horrific crime spree. Two separate trials would not have changed the fact that four people were brutally terrorized prior to their senseless executions, while a fifth, brave woman, will forever carry physical and mental scars every day for the rest of her life. It is rulings like this that require the need for atty jokes.
Yes, and the reason WHY she dissented is mind boggling. She argued that the majority didn't go FAR ENOUGH and that the entire case should be retried. What ... the .... eff!?
Please vote _out_ all Kansas Supreme Court incumbents that are up for a "retention vote". All seven of them, if we're lucky. Out. Vote NO for "retention" on each one of them.
Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!
Comment