Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

For science geeks only

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • For science geeks only

    http://phys.org/news/2012-10-real-physicists-method-universe-simulation.html#jCp

    A
    re we real, we may soon know:moon:
    I have come here to chew bubblegum and kickass ... and I'm all out of bubblegum.

  • #2
    A related reading giving some recent findings causing many to consider the possibity:

    In the fast lane

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by tropicalshox View Post
      A related reading giving some recent findings causing many to consider the possibity:

      http://www.globalone.tv/m/group/disc...ATopic%3A16058
      Thats weird, maybe theres something to this
      I have come here to chew bubblegum and kickass ... and I'm all out of bubblegum.

      Comment


      • #4
        You might take a look at Chuck Missler. He preached on the potential significance discoveries in quantum physics and boundaries of realty and what they really mean from a spiritual significance.

        The Ministry of Dr. Chuck Missler. View Bible study articles and resources, with topics including prophecy, current events, and practical Christian living.


        There has been research that would suggest we are holographic reality done by French scientist in 1982.

        Comment


        • #5
          Is the universe a holographic reality? Does objective reality really exist?

          In the fast lane

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by kcshocker11 View Post
            The real questions is, what happens when the simulation has completed? Will a real universe be put into play?

            If this current universe is a simulation, or a test run, then this indicates that there will be another universe.

            Revelation 21:1 "Now I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away...."

            Comment


            • #7
              Don't worry about not being real.

              In the fast lane

              Comment


              • #8
                What a sick person who created this simulated universe and made the KC professional sports teams. That's just cruel.
                ShockerHoops.net - A Wichita State Basketball Blog

                Comment


                • #9
                  So what if we are not "real?"

                  Does it really make any differernce to us or to our universe?

                  Hell, for all we know, our universe could simply be one of many piss bubbles in the toilet or fart bubbles in a bath tub?

                  I'm going to enjoy it as long as the heart keeps ticking and the brain still works.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by 60Shock View Post
                    So what if we are not "real?"
                    Just more proof of creator and gives some additional context to:


                    1 John 3:2 Beloved, now we are children of God, and it has not appeared as yet what we will be. We know that when He appears, we will be like Him, because we will Him just as He is.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      This is a common theme for people with Obsessive Compulsive Disorder. They wonder if they are real or if the universe is real. They obsess over it to the point it disrupts their lives.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I guess the reason this is for science geeks only is that philosophy geeks would just laugh at scientists' attempts to answer ontological questions.
                        "Cotton scared me - I left him alone." - B4MSU (Bear Nation poster) in reference to heckling players

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by The Mad Hatter View Post
                          I guess the reason this is for science geeks only is that philosophy geeks would just laugh at scientists' attempts to answer ontological questions.
                          Difference between scientist is they deal in hypotheses/theories and then attempt to prove/disprove them with facts/observations.

                          Philosophy geeks deal with "feelings" which can be misleading.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by SB Shock View Post
                            Difference between scientist is they deal in hypotheses/theories and then attempt to prove/disprove them with facts/observations.

                            Philosophy geeks deal with "feelings" which can be misleading.
                            Thanks for reinforcing some segments of the scientific community's cluelessness on both ontological and epistemological issues.
                            "Cotton scared me - I left him alone." - B4MSU (Bear Nation poster) in reference to heckling players

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Philosophers deal in hypotheses, observation and logical proofs. Scientists deal in hypotheses, observation and experimental proofs. They are really quite similar.
                              Livin the dream

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X