Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prosthetics in the Olympics: Fair or Unfair?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Prosthetics in the Olympics: Fair or Unfair?

    Great article on Michael Johnson's take. Actually I am very impressed with Michael Johnson's take. Not typical athlete hub-bub, but a well thought out position.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/oly...advantage.html

    What do you guys think?
    Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!

  • #2
    While I get Johnson's position, I think that the best way I have heard to frame this debate is to ask the question "would you be willing to lose your legs in order to get to run with prosthetics?" If your answer is no, then I have a hard time seeing the argument that you consider the person with prosthetics to possess an unfair advantage.
    "Cotton scared me - I left him alone." - B4MSU (Bear Nation poster) in reference to heckling players

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by The Mad Hatter View Post
      While I get Johnson's position, I think that the best way I have heard to frame this debate is to ask the question "would you be willing to lose your legs in order to get to run with prosthetics?" If your answer is no, then I have a hard time seeing the argument that you consider the person with prosthetics to possess an unfair advantage.
      I'm sorry, but that is the worst argument I've ever heard. Well maybe not the worst, but close to it. By that logic, they could have wheels and a motor and it wouldn't be an advantage because people wouldn't voluntarily lose their legs to get them.

      Comment


      • #4
        There are huge advances being made in robotic prostetics, bio-synthetic muscles and nanotechnology. The day of the 6-million dollar man is not that far away.

        Comment


        • #5
          Springtooth parts attached to the legs, not an advantage.
          People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. -Isaac Asimov

          Originally posted by C0|dB|00ded
          Who else posts fake **** all day in order to maintain the acrimony? Wingnuts, that's who.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by McShocker View Post
            I'm sorry, but that is the worst argument I've ever heard. Well maybe not the worst, but close to it. By that logic, they could have wheels and a motor and it wouldn't be an advantage because people wouldn't voluntarily lose their legs to get them.
            No that doesn't follow at all. Wheels and a motor are in a different category precisely because you don't need to lose your legs to use them. The blades entirely serve as a replacement for legs not an addition to them.
            "Cotton scared me - I left him alone." - B4MSU (Bear Nation poster) in reference to heckling players

            Comment


            • #7
              It's admirable what Pistorius has accomplished.

              He absolutely 100% should not be in the Olympic Games.

              He is doing something different.
              I think Pringles original intention was to make tennis balls... but on the day the rubber was supposed to show up a truckload of potatoes came. Pringles is a laid-back company, so they just said, "**** it, cut em up!" - MH

              Comment

              Working...
              X