I replaced a roof at my first home about 10 years ago as a condition of the sale before purchasing our current home. I had an ex-coworker who had started a contracting business and he was perhaps semi-qualified to put on a roof. He charged just shy of 2k which I figured was a decent deal at the time.
I had a leak in February and with my roof being over 20 years old, I decided to replace. I keep a high deductible on my home to save on premiums, so paid out of pocket. My neighbor had put a roof on his place the week prior. He received multiple quotes and most were about 10k but the one he went with was 6k. I decided to go with the same roofer. My quote came in a little higher but still seemed somewhat reasonable at 6,500. I do have a 3rd car garage whereas my neighbor doesn't.
A friend of mine had some hail damage from the recent storms and the insurance damage estimate was 18k for his home. Our houses are about the same size and I don't think he has anything special about his. I'm absolutely blown away by this damage estimate. Based on what he said, most roofers want to work directly with insurance to ensure they get the full amount. I'm left pondering why any insurance company would willingly pay 2.75x the fair amount. I'm making the assumption there's a pool of subcontractors virtually all of the roofing companies use so the workmanship is essentially equal.
At the end of the day, if insurance companies are paying out this much, my understanding is it will only make all of our rates go up, while we're giving roofers over 10k profit for a roofing job. MoValley John said a while back in regards to the government that if everyone had at least a little skin in the game, the gov't wouldn't get away with paying $50 for a hammer. I feel a similar principle should be in place with insurance. I don't understand why the insurance company doesn't have a calculator to calculate a fair cost of material plus a fair margin and set the cap there.
I had a leak in February and with my roof being over 20 years old, I decided to replace. I keep a high deductible on my home to save on premiums, so paid out of pocket. My neighbor had put a roof on his place the week prior. He received multiple quotes and most were about 10k but the one he went with was 6k. I decided to go with the same roofer. My quote came in a little higher but still seemed somewhat reasonable at 6,500. I do have a 3rd car garage whereas my neighbor doesn't.
A friend of mine had some hail damage from the recent storms and the insurance damage estimate was 18k for his home. Our houses are about the same size and I don't think he has anything special about his. I'm absolutely blown away by this damage estimate. Based on what he said, most roofers want to work directly with insurance to ensure they get the full amount. I'm left pondering why any insurance company would willingly pay 2.75x the fair amount. I'm making the assumption there's a pool of subcontractors virtually all of the roofing companies use so the workmanship is essentially equal.
At the end of the day, if insurance companies are paying out this much, my understanding is it will only make all of our rates go up, while we're giving roofers over 10k profit for a roofing job. MoValley John said a while back in regards to the government that if everyone had at least a little skin in the game, the gov't wouldn't get away with paying $50 for a hammer. I feel a similar principle should be in place with insurance. I don't understand why the insurance company doesn't have a calculator to calculate a fair cost of material plus a fair margin and set the cap there.
Comment