2022-2023 NET/RPI Rankings

[WuShock Reaper]

Conference RPI - 2023 Men's College Basketball | WarrenNolan.com

I know there are a lot of games to be played, but come 'on man.

Conference RPI Rankings (11/16/22)
#11 - SWAC
#12 - PAC-12
#13 - Big 12
#14 - Mid-American
#15 - Big West
#16 - Horizon League
#17 - American Athletic

[ShockerFever]

Do we really care about last year's rankings?

[WuShock Reaper]

Do we really care about last year's rankings?

That was my error on the tread title. Maybe a moderator can fix it to show: 2022-2023 NET/RPI Rankings

[WuShock Reaper]

[BostonWu]

Good thing for them they avoided a bad loss.

[WuShock Reaper]

[Stickboy46]

So let me get this straight .. all these years we just had to let IBA control the refs and operations and we could have had a neutral game vs a home game on our resume? Thanks ADDB .. probably never even asked the NCAA what it would take.

[Kel Varnsen]

So let me get this straight .. all these years we just had to let IBA control the refs and operations and we could have had a neutral game vs a home game on our resume? Thanks ADDB .. probably never even asked the NCAA what it would take.

Could be. Although I wonder if the WSU athletic department (specifically facilities and gameday ops) wanted to make sure they had control of it and IBA didn't screw anything up because if they do, WSU hears about it, not necessarily IBA.

But yeah it would have been really nice to have a neutral game win, specifically in 2015, 2016.

[SubGod22]

12.25.22 NET

CUSA 6

13 - FAU
41 - North Texas
52 - UAB
73 - Charlotte
172 - Rice
311 - UTSA

AAC

45 - Memphis
109 - Wichita
153 - Tulane
169 - ECU
194 - USF
195 - SMU
210 - Temple
246 - Tulsa

[ShockingButTrue]

12.25.22 NET

CUSA 6

13 - FAU
41 - North Texas
52 - UAB
73 - Charlotte
172 - Rice
311 - UTSA

AAC

45 - Memphis
109 - Wichita
153 - Tulane
169 - ECU
194 - USF
195 - SMU
210 - Temple
246 - Tulsa

Good gracious. The Valley is better than most (not all) of those teams.

Is there a spot in the Big East opening soon?

[RoyalShock]

So let me get this straight .. all these years we just had to let IBA control the refs and operations and we could have had a neutral game vs a home game on our resume? Thanks ADDB .. probably never even asked the NCAA what it would take.

The question is, will it be harder to sell the IBA game to potential "name" opponents now that they will get less NET benefit (or penalty) from playing there? It may cease to be the selling point it once was. On the other hand, for any potential opponent, it's one or two games spread over 2-4 years. So maybe not.

[SubGod22]

If we become relevant again I don't think being a neutral site harms us in attracting an opponent. Many would still see a benefit and they wouldn't be playing in the Roundhouse which is the ultimate selling point to many potential opponents.

[MikeKennedyRulZ]

Is there a spot in the Big East opening soon?

Not for the Shox in their current state, that is for darn sure.

[Kung Wu]

The question is, will it be harder to sell the IBA game to potential "name" opponents now that they will get less NET benefit (or penalty) from playing there? It may cease to be the selling point it once was. On the other hand, for any potential opponent, it's one or two games spread over 2-4 years. So maybe not.

I don't know, a guaranteed win against a recognizable brand seems attractive.

[SB Shock]

Part of WSU being at home for Intrust ga,es was so that IBA could be used to host NCAA tournament.