On this team, SHJ is our best perimeter threat. If Dennis had another D1 year, that wouldn't be true. SHJ would have been a deep bench player in previous years, but this isn't previous years.
It was maddening to watch him dribble 10 seconds off the shot clock when he got the ball. Watching a little closer, he was trying to find a defensive weakness that would let him drive to the basket. When he found that, the response out here was "at last he's figured out how he should play the game". When he couldn't find a way to drive, there was little thought among fans that he was trying to do what he does best, but it didn't work.
We've had many guards who were better in every aspect of the game than SHJ, but we don't have any of those guys this year. The fact that Marshall was willing to let SHJ create in late-game situations rather than run offensive sets should tell you a lot about Marshall's confidence in SHJ and his confidence in the Shox ability to successfully run sets.
SHJ has two game-winning buzzer beaters and his 3 against Clemson may as well have been a buzzer beater. SHJ seems to be at his best when the game is on the line. The way he gets his points is unorthodox to fans who watched VanVleet and Baker, but those guys are gone and Marshall had to figure out how to best use what he has this year. Marshall has consistently gone to SHJ in late-game situations, and this year Marshall has the best late-game results I can remember from his years at WSU.
Brauer's dagger 3 against Creighton still gets posted from time to time. SHJ gets criticized for taking a low-percentage shot that he made to win a game. Against Clemson he had a 6'8" defender on him from a switch. He made a between-the-legs dribble to move the defender out of position, took a step back and had space for a shot against a much taller defender. Maybe it was a low-percentage shot. Maybe it was the best low-percentage shot the Shox were going to get that possession. It went in and the Shox won the game. SHJ had the stones to put it down. if you want a comparison to a better shooter, I don't think Frankamp could have done that.
It was maddening to watch him dribble 10 seconds off the shot clock when he got the ball. Watching a little closer, he was trying to find a defensive weakness that would let him drive to the basket. When he found that, the response out here was "at last he's figured out how he should play the game". When he couldn't find a way to drive, there was little thought among fans that he was trying to do what he does best, but it didn't work.
We've had many guards who were better in every aspect of the game than SHJ, but we don't have any of those guys this year. The fact that Marshall was willing to let SHJ create in late-game situations rather than run offensive sets should tell you a lot about Marshall's confidence in SHJ and his confidence in the Shox ability to successfully run sets.
SHJ has two game-winning buzzer beaters and his 3 against Clemson may as well have been a buzzer beater. SHJ seems to be at his best when the game is on the line. The way he gets his points is unorthodox to fans who watched VanVleet and Baker, but those guys are gone and Marshall had to figure out how to best use what he has this year. Marshall has consistently gone to SHJ in late-game situations, and this year Marshall has the best late-game results I can remember from his years at WSU.
Brauer's dagger 3 against Creighton still gets posted from time to time. SHJ gets criticized for taking a low-percentage shot that he made to win a game. Against Clemson he had a 6'8" defender on him from a switch. He made a between-the-legs dribble to move the defender out of position, took a step back and had space for a shot against a much taller defender. Maybe it was a low-percentage shot. Maybe it was the best low-percentage shot the Shox were going to get that possession. It went in and the Shox won the game. SHJ had the stones to put it down. if you want a comparison to a better shooter, I don't think Frankamp could have done that.
Comment