Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bradley Coach fires back on Twitter

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by golferc View Post
    Just a thought, but it would appear that a number of post regarding Bradley and scheduling would boarder on the type of arrogance that we have come to despise from KU fans. Let's don't be them
    I don't see it as arrogant. If they became somewhat decent then maybe it would make sense to schedule them. I wouldn't want a home and home with Rutgers on UCONN's schedule.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by golferc View Post
      Just a thought, but it would appear that a number of post regarding Bradley and scheduling would boarder on the type of arrogance that we have come to despise from KU fans. Let's don't be them
      This isn't the same as KU turning down a top 50 or better type school

      Comment


      • #48
        f&C* no. free swinging punks , that brown dude, whatshisname. punk. f&Ck no. bradley and especially their fans reading this here can suck it. your punks try to hurt players.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by UCONN_Husky View Post

          I don't see it as arrogant. If they became somewhat decent then maybe it would make sense to schedule them. I wouldn't want a home and home with Rutgers on UCONN's schedule.
          I will refer to golferc as a brother (we never know for sure). Some of our Shocker brethren have an inferiority complex. Wardle did the exact thing that Marshall would have done if he was still in Wardle's shoes. And If Wardle were in Gregg's shoes, he would do what Marshall is doing and say "He'll No" we won't play you a H/H game. Wardle is exactly where Gregg was 10 years ago. He's a cocky SOB who believes in himself. He doesn't plan on being where he is now, in 5-10 years. Wardle doesn't expect Gregg to give him anything at this time anymore than Gregg expected "The Rug" to give him anything. However, right now, KU not playing us, makes them look weak. Now KSU is afraid, but they are below us, and we'd be doing them a favor.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Shockm View Post

            I will refer to golferc as a brother (we never know for sure). Some of our Shocker brethren have an inferiority complex. Wardle did the exact thing that Marshall would have done if he was still in Wardle's shoes. And If Wardle were in Gregg's shoes, he would do what Marshall is doing and say "He'll No" we won't play you a H/H game. Wardle is exactly where Gregg was 10 years ago. He's a cocky SOB who believes in himself. He doesn't plan on being where he is now, in 5-10 years. Wardle doesn't expect Gregg to give him anything at this time anymore than Gregg expected "The Rug" to give him anything. However, right now, KU not playing us, makes them look weak. Now KSU is afraid, but they are below us, and we'd be doing them a favor.
            are you retarded? marshall would never pull what wardle did last year... send players out to hurt people. marshall so does not do that.

            Comment


            • #51
              If in the '90's KU's coach had said, "We need to schedule more teams that suck, like Wichita State", that coach would have been correct. If KU fans had said, "No way we're putting a team like that on the schedule" - that's not arrogance. That's a statement of obvious fact.

              If Bradley ever gets a top-30 or top-40 type team and then we say, "We're too good to play them", then we'd be arrogant and elitist. Not wanting to play a H/H against a bottom tier MVC team is not arrogant or elitist. If they want to come here for a paycheck, they can get in line. Some day they might have a team good enough to get a buy game. Other than obvious warm up games, we're getting better teams than Bradley in here for a paycheck.
              The future's so bright - I gotta wear shades.
              We like to cut down nets and get sized for championship rings.

              Comment


              • #52
                My comment was not about whether or not to schedule a Bradley, but now that we are a nationally ranked program how we shocker fans conduct ourselves.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by golferc View Post
                  My comment was not about whether or not to schedule a Bradley, but now that we are a nationally ranked program how we shocker fans conduct ourselves.
                  You have a point there. We are kind of acting like fans of a nationally ranked program. When in the hard cold light of day, when you cut through the BS and deal with straight up reality, we are actually fans of a nationally ranked program.

                  I don't think I've ever heard any fans at any level apologize for being better than their opponents.
                  The future's so bright - I gotta wear shades.
                  We like to cut down nets and get sized for championship rings.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Spoken like a KU alum

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by golferc View Post
                      Spoken like a KU alum
                      Spoken like someone still embarrassed that their degree is from WSU.

                      Take some stinking pride in what you've got when what you've got deserves it.

                      The future's so bright - I gotta wear shades.
                      We like to cut down nets and get sized for championship rings.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Aargh View Post
                        If in the '90's KU's coach had said, "We need to schedule more teams that suck, like Wichita State", that coach would have been correct. If KU fans had said, "No way we're putting a team like that on the schedule" - that's not arrogance. That's a statement of obvious fact.

                        If Bradley ever gets a top-30 or top-40 type team and then we say, "We're too good to play them", then we'd be arrogant and elitist. Not wanting to play a H/H against a bottom tier MVC team is not arrogant or elitist. If they want to come here for a paycheck, they can get in line. Some day they might have a team good enough to get a buy game. Other than obvious warm up games, we're getting better teams than Bradley in here for a paycheck.
                        hmm.. bradley can f%ck off because a.) they tried to harm b.) they suck

                        pull your head out of your a**

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by another shocker View Post

                          pull your head out of your a**
                          You might try the same. It would greatly improve your ability to read and comprehend.

                          The future's so bright - I gotta wear shades.
                          We like to cut down nets and get sized for championship rings.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            No, I think most people would welcome Bradley on the schedule if and only if the Braves get their RPI to a consistent Top 100 level.

                            KU told Mark the same thing, that he needed to get RPI up...but when he finally did and ESPN offered a one-game showdown at AFH for the 2005-06 season, Mark was game but KU not only said no but EFF NO!
                            78-65

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by another shocker View Post

                              are you retarded? marshall would never pull what wardle did last year... send players out to hurt people. marshall so does not do that.
                              Calm down. You sound like you're taking a substance. I was only talking about their comments and tweets. While I understand Marshall, perhaps being put off by what happened against Bradley, he is a fighter. I remember Gregg fighting back when he was screwed. Wardle is fighting to vchange their culture and begin ning to win. It may not be exactly the same but Wardle was tired of getting his ass kicked and wanted his players not to quit. Wardle is a fighter and Gregg is also a fighter, and I for one like him that way.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by Shockm View Post

                                Calm down. You sound like you're taking a substance. I was only talking about their comments and tweets. While I understand Marshall, perhaps being put off by what happened against Bradley, he is a fighter. I remember Gregg fighting back when he was screwed. Wardle is fighting to vchange their culture and begin ning to win. It may not be exactly the same but Wardle was tired of getting his ass kicked and wanted his players not to quit. Wardle is a fighter and Gregg is also a fighter, and I for one like him that way.
                                and you sound like an asshole with 14 posts. wardle gets no break.. none.. because he justified that sorry display. marshall dying/chomping at the bit to get him back any way he can.. otherwise it would have been a 50 point beatdown this year for bradley. like letting loose the kraken. undercut players, hunh? even you know that means.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X